difference between a yacht and a cruise ship

Boat Virtue

Yacht vs Cruise Ship (4 Basic Differences)

Are you wondering what the difference is between a yacht and a cruise ship? Here’s a quick rundown of the key differences between these two types of vessels.

In simple words, Yachts are smaller , privately owned vessels. Cruise ships are large, publicly owned vessels.

Yachts typically have a small crew and can accommodate a limited number of passengers. Cruise ships have a large crews and can carry thousands of passengers.

Yachts are used for pleasure cruising, racing, or chartering. Cruise ships are used for passenger transportation, vacationing, or business purposes.

Further reading the article will give you detailed answers to your queries.

Table of Contents

Yacht vs Cruise Ship

For starters, yachts are generally much smaller than cruise ships. Yachts also tend to be more luxurious, and they often have a more intimate atmosphere onboard.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, are typically large vessels that can accommodate hundreds or even thousands of passengers.

They also tend to be more budget-friendly, and they offer a wide variety of activities and amenities for guests to enjoy.

When it comes to size, yachts definitely have the upper hand. The average yacht is around 100 feet long, while the average cruise ship is roughly three times that size.

This means that yachts are much more maneuverable than cruise ships, and they can often dock in places that larger vessels simply cannot.

Yachts also tend to be more luxurious than cruise ships. They usually have fewer passengers onboard, so there is more space for each guest to enjoy.

Yachts also often have nicer staterooms and suites, and they may offer more upscale amenities like private balconies and butler service.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, are typically more budget-friendly than yachts. They can accommodate more passengers, so they can spread the cost of the voyage over a larger number of people.

Cruise ships also often have a wider variety of activities and amenities available for guests to enjoy.

When it comes to privacy, yacht vs cruise ship, there are some important considerations to take into account. First and foremost, cruises tend to be much more crowded than yachts.

This means that you’ll likely have less privacy on a cruise ship than you would on a yacht. Additionally, cruises typically offer fewer amenities and activities than yachts.

This means that you’ll likely have to spend more time in your cabin or suite on a cruise ship than you would on a yacht.

Finally, cruises typically have stricter rules and regulations than yachts. This means that you’ll need to be more mindful of your behavior and actions on a cruise ship than you would on a yacht.

The debate between yacht and cruise ship safety is one that has been around for years. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is really the safest?

Let’s start with yachts. Yachts are typically much smaller than cruise ships, so they have less surface area for waves to hit.

They also have a lower center of gravity, which makes them less likely to tip over in high winds. And because they’re not as tall, they’re less likely to be damaged by large waves.

However, yachts do have some safety concerns. They’re not as stable as cruise ships, so they can roll more easily in rough seas.

And because they’re smaller, they can be more easily capsized by large waves. Now let’s look at cruise ships.

Cruise ships are much larger than yachts, so they have more surface area for waves to hit. They also have a higher center of gravity, which makes them more likely to tip over in high winds.

And because they’re taller, they’re more likely to be damaged by large waves. However, cruise ships also have some safety concerns.

They’re not as maneuverable as yachts, so they can’t avoid waves as easily. And because they’re so big, they can take longer to stop in an emergency situation.

It all comes down to the specific situation. If you’re concerned about rolling in rough seas, then a yacht is probably the better choice.

But if you’re worried about being capsized by a large wave, then a cruise ship is probably the safer option.

Of course, the best way to stay safe on the water is to be prepared for both scenarios. Make sure you know how to swim, and always wear a life jacket.

And be sure to check the weather forecast before you set sail . That way, you can be sure to avoid any dangerous conditions.

Itinerary Flexibility & Customization

One of the key advantages that a yacht has over a cruise ship is itinerary flexibility and customization. Yacht charters offer a much more personalized vacation experience.

Allowing you to tailor your trip to suit your specific needs and interests. You can choose to explore secluded coves and anchorages, visit remote islands, or sail to popular tourist destinations.

There is no set itinerary, so you are free to go at your own pace and spend as much or as little time in each location as you wish.

Another advantage of chartering a yacht is that you can often customize the onboard experience to suit your group’s preferences.

For example, if you are interested in watersports, you can charter a yacht with equipment and staff specifically for this purpose.

Or, if you prefer a more relaxed vacation, you can charter a yacht with a spa and onboard chef. There is no need to compromise on your dream vacation when you charter a yacht.

Finally, chartering a yacht gives you the opportunity to enjoy a luxurious vacation without the crowds and hassles often associated with cruise ships.

You will have your own private vessel to enjoy, complete with everything you need for a relaxing and enjoyable trip.

Whether you are looking for an intimate getaway or a grand adventure, a charter yacht vacation is a perfect way to escape the ordinary and experience something truly unforgettable.

If you are interested in exploring the world on your own terms, a yacht charter vacation may be the perfect option for you.

With so many advantages over cruise ships, it is easy to see why this type of vacation is becoming increasingly popular.

Amazing Food & Drink

When it comes to food and drink, there are some big differences between yacht and cruise ship vacations.

On a yacht, you’ll have access to much better food and drink options, as well as the opportunity to dine in more intimate settings.

And of course, you’ll be able to enjoy the beautiful views from your yacht while you enjoy your meal. On a cruise ship, the food and drink options are more limited.

And you’ll likely be stuck eating in the buffet line with everyone else. Another big difference between yacht and cruise ship vacations is the size of the accommodations.

Yachts tend to be much smaller than cruise ships, so you’ll have a more intimate experience on board. You’ll also have more privacy on a yacht since there are fewer people on board.

And of course, you’ll be able to enjoy the beautiful views from your yacht while you relax in your cabin. On a cruise ship, the accommodations are typically larger.

So you’ll have less privacy and more noise. And of course, you’ll be stuck on a cruise ship with hundreds or even thousands of other people.

If you want a more intimate and luxurious experience, then a yacht is probably the better option. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly vacation with plenty of activities and amenities, then a cruise ship is probably a better choice.

Yacht vs Cruise Ship: Key Differences Explained

Many travelers look at luxury yacht rentals and cruise ships when planning a vacation at sea. But there are some major distinctions between these two options. Understanding the key differences can help you choose the best one to suit your needs and expectations.

Size and Capacity

The most obvious difference is size and guest capacity. Cruise ships are massive, housing 2000-6000 passengers.

Even small ships carry 600+ people. In contrast, chartered yachts max out around 12 guests, with typical capacities of 6-10. The intimate scale ensures an exclusive escape.

Itineraries and Flexibility

Cruises sail along fixed routes and strict schedules, whereas yacht charters offer total itinerary flexibility. Craft your own custom route with a captain. Spend more time in spots you love and bypass others. The only fixed elements are your start/end ports.

Onboard Experience

The onboard ambiance varies dramatically between the two. Cruise ships feel like floating cities with crowds everywhere. You’ll share amenities with thousands of fellow passengers. Chartered yachts provide a private, peaceful retreat catered to you. No queues or sharing.

Activities and Entertainment

Both offer plenty of amenities, but the vibe is different. Cruises offer fun activities like casinos and shows, while yachts provide relaxation and adventures like snorkeling and fishing. The choice depends on your interests.

Service and Cuisine

With thousands of guests, cruise staff and dining cannot provide truly personalized service. You get more staff interaction on a yacht, including a captain dedicated to your charter. Included in the experience is fine dining with customized menus and premium alcohol.

For an exclusive getaway on your terms, a private yacht charter reigns supreme. But mass market cruises suit travelers who enjoy crowds and scripted entertainment. Evaluate your priorities to choose the best seafaring vacation.

Booking and Costs

Booking a cruise is relatively simple through major cruise lines or agencies, while yacht charters require researching reputable brokers and charter companies, of which there are many. Cruise fares per person are lower, but a fully crewed yacht divided among guests can still be competitive. Keep costs variable by booking a bareboat yacht charter.

Destinations and Departure Ports

Cruise ships certainly provide a wide variety of itineraries, but their large size limits them to major cruise ports. Yachts can access small coves, secluded islands, and exotic locales that mega-ships can’t reach. Many more departure ports are accessible for yacht charters too.

Onboard Accommodations

Staterooms on a cruise provide basic comfort, often with an ocean view. Yachts feature lavish staterooms and master suites with hotel-style amenities. You’ll get complete privacy, often with en-suite bathrooms. Some large charter yachts rival small boutique hotels in luxury. .

Health and Safety

Mass gatherings on cruises can enable the rapid spread of illnesses like COVID or norovirus. Yachts provide isolation from crowds and allow immunocompromised guests to vacation safely. Strict protocols keep private yachts disinfected, and both options mandate safety drills and procedures.

Read Our Billfish Policy

Our Crews Prefer

Yacht vs Cruise Ship: A Comprehensive Comparison

• Recent Posts

• Coolife Luggage Review: The Ultimate Travel Companion – February 5, 2024
• Monos Luggage Review: Is the Hype Worth It for Monos Carry-On Suitcases? – February 2, 2024
• Montage Laguna Beach: Luxurious Retreat by the Sea – February 1, 2024

What is a Yacht?

A yacht is a private, luxury watercraft designed for leisure use. They range from smaller vessels that can be sailed or driven by the owner, to superyachts that require a professional crew to operate. Yachts are known for their luxury amenities and personalized services.

What is a Cruise Ship?

A cruise ship, on the other hand, is a large passenger ship used for pleasure voyages. Cruise ships are essentially floating resorts, offering a wide range of amenities and activities. They can accommodate hundreds or even thousands of passengers.

Yacht vs Cruise Ship: The Key Differences

There are several key differences between a yacht and a cruise ship, including size, amenities, travel experience, and privacy.

The most obvious difference is size. While yachts can be quite large—superyachts often exceed 100 feet in length—cruise ships are significantly larger. Some of the biggest cruise ships can carry more than 6,000 passengers and 2,000 crew members.

Both yachts and cruise ships offer luxury amenities, but the scope differs greatly. Cruise ships often feature multiple dining venues, bars, pools, fitness centers, spas, theatres, and even shopping malls. Yachts, while smaller, offer high-end, personalized amenities like private chefs, hot tubs, and custom entertainment systems.

Travel Experience

The travel experience also differs significantly. Cruise ships follow set itineraries with scheduled stops at various ports. Yacht charters, on the other hand, offer more flexibility, allowing you to customize your itinerary and explore less crowded, off-the-beaten-path destinations.

Privacy is another critical difference. On a yacht, you share the space with only your chosen guests and crew. On a cruise ship, you’re traveling with a large number of other passengers, which can affect your privacy.

Superyacht vs Ship: A Unique Comparison

A superyacht is a large, privately-owned yacht that is professionally crewed. But how does it compare to a ship?

Size and Capability

While superyachts are smaller than cruise ships, they are often more technologically advanced. They are designed to deliver a luxurious, personalized experience and can navigate areas that larger ships can’t access.

Luxury and Exclusivity

Superyachts are synonymous with luxury and exclusivity. From high-end finishes and bespoke interiors to personalized service and gourmet dining, superyachts offer a level of luxury that even the most upscale cruise ships struggle to match.

Cruise Ship vs Yacht Vacations: Which One to Choose?

The choice between a cruise ship vacation and a yacht charter depends on your preferences and expectations.

If you’re traveling with a large group or want to meet new people, a cruise ship might be a better option. If you prefer a more intimate, private experience with family or friends, a yacht charter would be ideal.

Cruise ships offer fixed itineraries and pre-planned activities, which can be great for those who prefer a structured vacation. Yacht charters offer more flexibility and freedom to explore at your own pace.

Cruise ship vacations are generally more affordable, with costs spread out among many passengers. Yacht charters can be more expensive, but they offer a unique, personalized experience that many find worth the higher price tag.

How Charters Deliver a Truly 5-Star Experience

Yacht charters are known for delivering a truly 5-star experience, offering unparalleled luxury, privacy, and flexibility.

Personalized Service

With a professional crew at your disposal, you can expect personalized service tailored to your preferences. This can include everything from custom menus prepared by your private chef to itinerary planning based on your interests.

Luxury Amenities

Yacht charters offer high-end, luxury amenities. From plush accommodations and private dining areas to onboard entertainment systems and water sports equipment, everything is designed for your comfort and enjoyment.

Flexibility

One of the biggest advantages of yacht charters is the flexibility they offer. You can set your own pace, choose your destinations, and change your itinerary as you wish.

In conclusion, while both yachts and cruise ships offer luxurious water travel experiences, they cater to different needs and preferences. Whether you prefer the intimate luxury of a yacht charter or the extensive amenities and social opportunities of a cruise ship, there’s a perfect option out there for your next vacation.

Related posts

Coolife Luggage Review: The Ultimate Travel Companion

Monos Luggage Review: Is the Hype Worth It for Monos Carry-On Suitcases?

Montage Laguna Beach: Luxurious Retreat by the Sea

Secrets Maroma Beach Riviera Cancun Explored: Journey to Coastal Bliss

Paradise Showdown: Maui vs Kauai – Which Hawaiian Paradise Wins Your Heart?

Bora Bora vs Maldives: The Ultimate Paradise Showdown!

Unveiling Santorini’s Top 10 Beach Clubs: Where Luxury Meets Coastal Bliss

Brics Luggage Review: The Perfect Travel Companion for the Jetsetter!

Recommended.

The Ultimate Showdown: Travelpro vs London Fog – Which Luggage Reigns Supreme?

Travelpro vs Delsey: Battle of the Titans – Which Luggage Brand Reigns Supreme?

Sunny Escapes: San Juan Water and Beach Club Unveiled

Unveiling Miami’s Finest: The Top 10 Beach Clubs for Ultimate Coastal Escapes

Get Connected

Follow Ample Journey on social media for travel tips, packing hacks, and latest updates!

Sub To Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest travel tips, packing hacks, gear reviews, and bargain deals straight to your inbox. We hate spam, so we’ll send only the most important stuff.

Ample Journey is a dedicated team of passionate travel enthusiasts who are committed to enriching the travel experiences of tourists, adventure seekers, and travelers of all kinds in a heartwarming and professional manner.

2 Burton Rd, Wool, Wareham BH20 6EY, UK

Yacht Sourcing > Yacht vs Cruise Ship: Which One is Right for You?

Yacht vs Cruise Ship: Which One is Right for You?

• June 25, 2024

When considering a luxury vacation on the water, the primary choices often come down to a yacht or a cruise ship. Both offer incredible experiences, but there are some key differences you should consider before making a decision. In this article, Yacht Sourcing will explore the main differences between a yacht vs cruise ship to help you make the best choice.

What is a Yacht?

A yacht is a private vessel that is usually smaller and more intimate compared to a cruise ship. Yachts are often used for private trips or exclusive charters, offering greater privacy and flexibility. At Yacht Sourcing, we offer a wide range of luxury yachts equipped with modern amenities and exceptional personalized services. Understanding the difference between a yacht vs cruise ship can help you decide which fits your lifestyle better.

What is a Cruise Ship?

A cruise ship is a large vessel designed to carry hundreds to thousands of passengers on long sea voyages. Cruise ships offer a variety of amenities, such as restaurants, swimming pools, entertainment, and numerous activities. They are ideal for those who want to enjoy a sailing experience with plenty of facilities and social interactions. Comparing a yacht vs cruise ship, you will find that cruise ships offer a more communal experience.

Key Differences between a Yacht and a Cruise Ship

1. Size and Capacity : Yachts are typically smaller and can accommodate fewer passengers, whereas cruise ships can carry thousands of passengers at once. When comparing a yacht vs cruise ship, size is a significant factor.

2. Privacy and Exclusivity : Yachts offer more privacy and exclusivity, ideal for private or family trips. Cruise ships are better suited for those who enjoy a social atmosphere and meeting new people.

3. Amenities and Activities : Cruise ships offer a wide range of amenities and onboard activities, while yachts provide a more personalized and flexible experience.

4. Routes and Destinations : Yachts allow you to explore more secluded and exclusive spots, whereas cruise ships have more fixed routes and often visit major ports. Considering a yacht vs cruise ship, the choice of destinations can be quite different.

Which One is Right for You?

The choice between a yacht vs cruise ship depends on your personal preferences. If you seek a more private and exclusive experience, a yacht might be the best choice. However, if you want to enjoy a variety of amenities and meet many people, a cruise ship could be the right option.

For more information about our luxury yacht options and charter services, visit the Yacht Sourcing website or contact our team, who are ready to help you plan your dream vacation on the water.

Interested about this topic? Check out other articles from Yacht Sourcing below:

• The Best Time to Visit Bali for an Unforgettable Experience
• Cruising in Elegance: Discovering the Allure of Pink Beach Indonesia with Yacht Sourcing

More Stories

Bali Starling: A Glimpse of Hope in Paradise

Valuing Your Dream: How to Determine the Market Value of a Luxury Yacht for Sale

The Ultimate Guide to Megayachts: Luxury Living Afloat

Bali’s Hidden East Coast Paradise: What to do in Amed

Unveiling Your Dream Yacht: 5 Must-Haves for Epic Yachting Adventures

Unlock Your Boating Dreams: Benefits of Attending a Boat Show

HEADQUARTER

Destinations

Yacht management

BUY A YACHT

CHARTER A YACHT

MANAGE YACHTS

• @[email protected]
• +62 812 3600 1024

Get an exclusive offer for yacht charter and sales, also get the latest yachts update right in your inbox!

Yacht Charter vs Cruise Ship

Yacht Charters vs. Cruises: What’s the Difference?

A vacation at sea seems like the ultimate escape. Guests get to explore beautiful coastal destinations aboard a sailing yacht, catamaran or cruise ship and enjoy the open ocean.

When it comes to a seafaring holiday, travelers have two options: A cruise ship vs. a yacht charter.

Although these types of vacations share some similarities, they couldn’t be more different. Whereas cruises have set itineraries and serve groups of more than 3,000 guests, luxury yacht charters offer a more intimate and personalized experience. Yacht charter guests, for example, receive unparalleled service, amazing chef-prepared cuisine, they can plan completely customizable itineraries, and they have access to more exclusive ports in the world’s top luxury destinations.

Bottom line: If you want to explore beaches, islands and port towns around the world, consider a private yacht charter and enjoy an experience you won’t soon forget.

Here are some of the key differences between cruises and yacht charters:

• Explore More

Due to their size, cruise ships must stop in larger and deeper ports. For example, in the Virgin Islands , cruise ships can only access the largest ports like Charlotte Amalie (USVI) and Tortola (BVI). Therefore, cruise guests miss out on the smaller, more exclusive islands and destinations in those areas like Jost Van Dyke and Virgin Gorda.

Private charter yachts, though, don’t require such large ports, and therefore, yacht charters can go to smaller islands, hidden beaches, secluded anchorages, and dive spots away from the cruise ship crowds. Not to mention, larger charter yachts typically have a tender onboard, and therefore, guests can motor up to virtually any beach or cove.

• Enjoy the Ultimate in Privacy

The majority of cruise ships accommodate more than 3,000 passengers. These guests all share the same amenities and dining room spaces, and as such, a cruise tends to feel crowded.

Yacht charters, though, are much more intimate. Just you and your guests are sharing the yacht (along with your dedicated crew). Therefore, you can spread out and relax, and avoid the crowds and lines you’d likely experience on a cruise.

Due to the crowds and shared activity and dining spaces, cruise ships are notorious for spreading germs and viruses. That’s a real concern for travelers, especially with the world’s new COVID-19 realities. Not to mention, social distancing is all but impossible on a cruise.

Charter yachts offer a much safer experience. For example, charter yachts are cleaned and disinfected before and during each charter, helping to limit the spread of disease. You can plan your vacation to be fully social-distanced – i.e. arriving on a private flight, avoiding crowded restaurants and ports, etc. And because you control the guest list, you know your fellow passengers won’t be spreading disease.

• Itinerary Flexibility & Customization

On a cruise ship, the itinerary and your onboard activities are typically set in stone. As such, you might have to miss out an activity or port of call that you had wanted to experience.

Yacht charter guests have much more freedom. Guests can control virtually any aspect of a yacht charter, including:

• Itineraries – Pick what you see and where you stay
• Menus – Help your chef plan the menu to your tastes
• Shore Excursions – Explore the places you’d like when in port
• Daily Schedule – Design your days to best suit your tastes, e.g. meal times, activities, etc.
• Exceptional Service

Yacht charters deliver a truly 5-star experience. Aboard a yacht, you’ll be served by a dedicated crew. In fact, most crewed yachts have a crew-to-guest ratio of one-to-one. That means you’ll always have a stewardess to top off your drinks, help you plan shoreside excursions, and provide top-notch meal service.

You’ll also have access to a deck crew that can help you plan and set up water sports, tender excursions, and beach picnics.

• Amazing Food & Drink

Charter guests are served by an onboard chef, who will design menus to meet your exacting preferences. In fact, prior to embarking, guests provide the chef with their food and beverage preferences. The chef then uses this information to develop menus that meet the guests’ preferences to a T. Available food and drink options include: tasting menus, pairings, themed dinners, birthday celebrations and more.

• More Activities and Water Sports

On cruises, the shore excursions are limited. One reason is time. You might only have a few hours in port, before you’re required to be back onboard. Another reason is the size the cruise ship. You won’t have access to the water, like you do onboard a charter yacht.

Charters provide guests with an amazing list of activities to enjoy. In fact, most charter yachts have an array of water sports toys and equipment for guests to enjoy, including jet skis, tenders, snorkel and scuba gear, and water slides. Another benefit: Charter guests have much more freedom to plan shoreside activities.

Ready to Plan Your Luxury Yacht Charter Vacation?

When it comes to vacations at sea, a yacht charter offers the best in privacy, customization, and service. Considering a yacht charter? Contact a broker with Worldwide Boat.

We provide yacht charters of all types in some of the world’s top yachting destinations including the Caribbean, the West Mediterranean, New England, and Greece. Let us help you plan a luxury yacht charter today.

Showing 1–4 of 288 results

282.2ft / 84m

278.1ft / 83m

239.6ft / 71m

Serenity 236

236.3ft / 70m

Set your search criteria to find the perfect yacht

• Alaska Australia Bahamas BVI Caribbean Croatia Florida France Galapagos Greece Indonesia Italy Malaysia Maldives Mexico Mediterranean New England Norway Spain Thailand Tahiti Turkey
• Motor Yacht Catamaran Sailing Boats
• 2 4 6 8 10 12 12+

Search by yacht name

Yacht vs Cruise Ship Travel: Pros and Cons of Two Sailing Types

Posted on Last updated: March 15, 2024

When it comes to sea travel, deciding on going on a Yacht vs Cruise Ship can be a huge decision! After all, ahh, life on the open ocean. The salty wind whipping through your hair, the sun bronzing your skin, the endless blue horizon beckoning you forward.

It’s no wonder vacation dreams often involve the sea, but deciding how to conquer it can be the real challenge. 

Do you chart your own course aboard a luxurious yacht, or join the bustling community of a cruise ship? Both options offer thrilling escapes, but navigating Yacht vs Cruise Ship pros and cons is crucial for reaching your ideal vacation paradise. Let’s hop aboard to learn more!

Yachts vs Cruise Ships: Yacht Travel 101

Sailing on a yacht usually involves a certain level of privacy and a much smaller size than a cruise ship. Yachts may range in size from about 10 to 40+ people with space for a lot of crew, too. Whether you purchase or charter a yacht, plenty of luxury is included.

Imagine waking up to the gentle lullaby of waves lapping against your private sun deck. A sleek yacht is your vessel, not a vessel to you. Its size grants access to hidden coves and secluded beaches inaccessible to larger ships like cruise ships.

Imagine anchoring by a pristine coral reef, diving into teeming marine life, then returning to a gourmet spread prepared by your personal chef.

Pros Of Yacht Travel

The following are the pros of yacht travel, like YACHTZOO :

• Unparalleled Privacy: You set the pace, choose the destinations, and bask in the exclusivity of your own floating sanctuary with yacht travel. No crowded buffets, no jostling for poolside loungers, just you and your chosen companions.
• Customization Galore: Design your itinerary around hidden gems, off-the-beaten-path adventures, and personal whims around your destination. 
• Luxury Personified: From plush cabins with ocean views to private Jacuzzis and dedicated spa therapists, yachts pamper you with five-star service and amenities that redefine indulgence. Many services offer different sizes and kinds of yachts to choose from.
• Unforgettable Experiences: Yacht traveling unlocks unique adventures no sea travel option can offer on a more private level.

There are some types of yacht travel that are not private, such as Croatia sailing tours on large or small-size yachts, where you’ll book a place on a set itinerary with others. Even in non-private yacht travel, the groups are much smaller and more personalized.

Cons Of Yacht Travel

The following are the cons of yacht travel:

• Eye-watering Price Tag: Owning or chartering a yacht is a luxury reserved for the elite. Costs can soar into the millions of dollars, depending on the yacht’s size, amenities, and destination.
• Limited Space: While offering intimacy, yachts lack the expansive decks and bustling social scene of cruise ships. For those seeking lots of socialization with fellow travelers, the yacht experience might feel too secluded.
• Logistical Hurdles: From navigating unfamiliar waters to handling maintenance and provisioning, yacht life can be demanding, especially if you charter one yourself. Unless you have a seasoned crew at your disposal, be prepared for some hands-on work.
• Limited Entertainment: While the ocean itself provides endless entertainment, yachts lack the onboard casino, theaters, and diverse activity options found on cruise ships. Consider your desire for onboard thrills when making your choice.
• Seasickness: Smaller boats often rock more and have more potential for seasickness. Bigger boats are generally more stable.

Yachts vs Cruise Ships: Cruise Ship Travel 101

Sailing on a cruise ship always involves larger crowds, but more things to do. There are up to thousands of people on cruise ships with bustling buffets and events. But, there are still private rooms and ways to make your cruise experience more exclusive.

Picture towering decks teeming with life, the aroma of international cuisine wafting from a dozen restaurants, and the thrumming excitement of high-end live shows.

Cruise ships are microcosms of vibrant worlds, offering an abundance of activities, destinations, and social connections. When it comes to comparing travel on a yacht vs cruise ship, let’s now talk cruise life!

Pros Of Cruise Ship Travel

The following are the pros of traveling via cruise ship:

• Value-Packed Vacations: Compared to yachts, cruises offer a surprisingly affordable way to experience luxury travel. All-inclusive packages cover meals, accommodation, entertainment, and often shore excursions, making budgeting a breeze. There are also many epic last-minute deals.
• Endless Entertainment: From exhilarating water slides and onboard casinos to world-class theater productions and themed parties, cruise ships cater to every taste and age group. Boredom is simply not an option on these bustling behemoths, and it’s effortless to make friends.
• Diverse Destinations: Cruise itineraries whisk you away to the best of exotic locations. Each port of call unveils new cultures, cuisines, and adventures, all within the comfort of your floating home.
• Cover More Distance: Cruise ships have a largce size and tons of power. If you want to cover more distance and visit more islands, countries or ports during your vacation time, cruises can cover more ground than yachts can.
• A Dream Come True For The Social Butterfly: From cocktail mixers to poolside chats and organized shore excursions, cruise ships provide ample opportunities to mingle with fellow travelers. Most cruisers end up forging new friendships and having a great time at the parties and events.

Cons Of Cruise Ship Travel

The following are the cons of cruise ship travel:

• Crowded Quarters: Brace yourself for busy decks, overflowing buffets, and limited personal space. There are lots of people packed into smaller spaces on cruise ships, with smaller rooms and lots of chairs packed onto the sun decks.
• Fixed Itineraries: Cruise ships follow predetermined routes, leaving little room for spontaneity or off-the-beaten-path exploration. If you crave a flexible adventure, the rigid schedule might feel restrictive. Even if you explore on your own at each port of call, the ship will always leave within about half a day of arriving, leaving you time to choose only one tour or activity.
• Potential Seasickness: For those prone to motion sickness, the gentle sway of the ocean can also lead to seasickness. Consult your doctor beforehand if you have concerns.
• Environmental Impact: The sheer size and energy consumption of cruise ships raise environmental concerns. Consider choosing eco-conscious companies and shore excursions to minimize your footprint.

Hidden Costs Of Yacht And Cruise Ship Travel

Just like there are pros and cons of traveling on yachts vs cruise chips, hidden costs are also something to consider when choosing to sail on a yacht or a cruise, as the true cost extends beyond the initial price tag.

For yacht adventures, expenses such as fuel, provisions, marina fees, and crew gratuities can add up quickly. 

Cruise ships, nevertheless, present their own hidden costs. Shore excursions, specialty dining, onboard spa treatments, and premium beverage packages can easily inflate the initial price. Be conscious of add-ons that can inflate your vacation’s budget.

Additionally, factor in the cost of travel to and from embarkation points, which can be significant depending on your location and the cruise vacation itinerary. Consider choosing sailing trips that leave from an easily accessible place or somewhere with a bigger airport.

Embracing Sustainability In Yacht And Cruise Ship Vacations

While both yachts and cruise ships present potential sustainability concerns, responsible choices can mitigate carbon footprint. Look into sustainable sailing ship options to minimize your footprint.

For yacht enthusiasts, opting for smaller, fuel-efficient vessels and prioritizing eco-friendly marinas can make a difference. To add, supporting locally-sourced provisions and minimizing onboard waste contribute to a more sustainable yachting experience.

Cruise lines, as well, are making strides towards eco-friendliness. Selecting companies committed to alternative fuels, water conservation technologies, and responsible waste management practices goes a long way.

Plus, opting for shore excursions focused on environmental conservation and supporting local communities allows you to connect with your destinations in a sustainable way.

Choosing Your Mode Of Travel: Weighing in on theYacht vs Cruise Ship Pros and Cons

Ultimately, the ‘yacht vs. cruise ship’ debate boils down to your personal preferences and priorities. 

For those seeking unparalleled privacy, bespoke adventures, and unbridled luxury, yachts are the best choice. But for those who crave meeting fellow travelers and enjoying new travel experiences and itineraries with others and so on, cruise ships might be the options for you.

Bon Voyage!

Ultimately, the best course of sea travel lies in embracing the unique benefits of each vessel, as the pros and cons of yachts vs cruises comes down to the individual.

Whether you chart your own course on a sleek yacht or join the vibrant community of a majestic cruise ship, it’s best that you enjoy the precious moments at sea with your loved ones. Go forward – set your sails, raise your anchor, and embark on your own personal sea vacation travel.

Privacy Overview

• San Lorenzo
• Yacht Rental in Dubai Marina
• Yacht Party Dubai
• Overnight Experience
• Formula 1 Abu Dhabi
• Corporate Events
• Fifa World Cup 2022
• Anniversary Celebrations

Connect with a yacht expert & get per personalised Deals

Difference Between Yacht and Cruise: Which is Right for You?

Yachts offer a personalized, luxurious experience with complete control over the itinerary, ideal for intimate gatherings. Conversely, cruises provide a social atmosphere with diverse entertainment and pre-planned itineraries, accommodating a larger crowd. Which one is right for you? Let me give you in-depth information so you can make an informed decision.

Yacht Vs Cruise

Advantages of Yachts

Yachts offer an unmatched escape with complete privacy, customizable itineraries, exclusive amenities, and packages . Imagine secluded coves, personalized meals, and a crew dedicated to fulfilling your every desire without the crowds found on cruises. With a yacht, you become the captain of your luxurious adventure. The advantages of yachts are:

Itinerary Control

Exclusive amenities.

• Personalized Service

Yachts offer a true getaway far from the land-based bustle and the crowds that can be found on even the most luxurious cruise ships. Picture yourself anchoring in a secluded cove with pristine turquoise waters, accessible only by your private vessel. Host intimate dinners on deck under the stars,  or relax, knowing that your onboard oasis is yours alone.

With a yacht charter, chart your own course through the Arabian Gulf’s wonders. Desire an extended stay on a pristine island off the coast of Abu Dhabi? Consider it done. Do you wish to delve into the vibrant souks of Muscat or the historic charm of Bahrain? The itinerary is entirely at your command. Spend days, not mere hours, soaking in the destinations that speak to your soul.

Many yachts offer exquisite amenities designed to maximize your enjoyment. Imagine soaking in a hot tub as you sail into the sunset, trying out the latest water toys like jet skis or paddleboards, or savoring a gourmet meal prepared by your private chef. Unlike a cruise, you won’t find yourself sharing these luxuries or waiting your turn. Yachts are there to enhance every moment of your experience. For instance:

• Exploring the ancient ruins and turquoise waters of Turkey
• Diving the vibrant coral reefs of the Red Sea
• Experiencing the ultra-modern marvels of Dubai Harbour
• Discovering the hidden gems of Oman’s coastline

Personalized Services

The crew onboard a yacht exists to make your vacation extraordinary. From the skilled captain navigating your course to the chef tailoring meals to your preferences to the attentive staff maintaining your pristine surroundings, exceptional service is ingrained in the yachting experience. Your crew anticipates your needs, ensuring that your desires are met with attentive care from the first welcome to the final farewell.

Advantages of Cruises

Cruises have their own advantages, such as:

Social Atmosphere

Stress-free simplicity, abundant amenities, maximize your vacation budget, diverse cruise lines cater to all.

• Theme Cruises add a Twist

Cruises offer a vibrant social environment for like-minded travelers. Meet new people at onboard events, share meals and conversations with fellow passengers, or join group activities and shore excursions. This atmosphere is perfect for forging friendships, celebrating special occasions, or simply enjoying the company of others while at sea.

Let the Planning Be Done for You. From the moment you step on board, your itinerary, entertainment, and meals are arranged. Cruises take the hassle out of travel, allowing you to truly relax and focus on enjoying the destinations. Leave the logistics headaches behind and unwind.

You have endless options for adventure and relaxation. Modern cruise ships, particularly the larger vessels, resemble floating resorts packed with activities for all ages and interests. Pools, water slides, casinos, theaters, spas, and diverse dining options ensure there’s never a dull moment. Whether you seek high-energy excitement or soothing relaxation, there’s something for you.

Cruises often offer an excellent price-to-experience ratio. Your fare generally includes accommodations, meals, most onboard activities, and transportation between destinations. Family-friendly lines and all-inclusive packages can be especially budget-conscious options, letting you stretch your vacation Dirhams.

While the core concept remains the same, the experience between different cruise lines varies greatly. Research the options for a perfect match, whether a family-focused line with kid-friendly thrills, a luxury cruise emphasizing refined service, or an expedition cruise geared toward adventurous exploration.

Cost Comparison: Yachts vs Cruises

Types of Yachts

The world of yachting offers exciting diversity. To make informed choices, here’s a look at common yacht categories:

• Propulsion-based Yachts
• Purpose-based Yachts

Let’s discuss the yachts categories under the propulsion category:

Cruising Yachts

Designed for comfort and extended voyages, both motor and sailing yachts can be classified as cruisers. They prioritize living space, stability, and amenities for long-term enjoyment. Cruising yachts typically range from 40 to 100 feet in length, with larger vessels offering even more space and amenities.

Popular amenities on cruising yachts include spacious cabins with en-suite bathrooms, well-equipped galleys (kitchens), salons (living areas), sundecks, and swim platforms. Some larger cruising yachts may also boast features like jacuzzis, tenders (small boats for shore access), and even gyms.

Sportfishing Yachts

Equipped for serious anglers, these have fishing gear, outriggers (structures extending from the sides of the boat to support fishing lines), and fighting chairs (specialized chairs designed for battling large fish). They sacrifice some luxury for performance and fishing functionality. Sportfishing yachts typically range from 30 to 70 feet in length and prioritize features like deep freeze storage for bait and catch, rod holders, fighting chairs, and sturdy construction to handle the rigors of sportfishing.

Expedition Yachts

Built for adventure, these sturdy vessels can tackle remote destinations and rougher seas. They often have long-range capabilities, reinforced hulls for navigating ice or debris, and features like tenders and Zodiacs (inflatable boats) for exploring ashore.

Expedition yachts typically start around 80 feet and can reach well over 200 feet in length. They prioritize features like fuel efficiency for long voyages, ice-classed hulls for navigating in polar regions, ample storage space for provisions and equipment, and guest amenities that may include wet labs for marine research or observation areas for wildlife viewing.

Superyachts/Megayachts

The pinnacle of luxury, these are essentially floating mansions. They feature extravagant amenities like helipads, pools, cinemas, and even submarines. Superyachts typically start at around 150 feet and can exceed well over 500 feet in length. They offer the ultimate customization, with amenities and features limited only by the owner’s imagination and budget.

Types of Cruises

Cruising offers adventures for all travel styles. Let’s dive into the main categories and some exciting niche options:

Contemporary Lines

The most popular type caters to a wide audience. These large ships (“floating resorts”) offer diverse activities, entertainment, family-friendly amenities, and itineraries worldwide. Think of Carnival, Royal Caribbean , and Norwegian.

Premium Lines

Similar to contemporary lines, but a step up in service quality and refinement. They might have slightly higher prices, focusing on excellent food and more attentive service—for example, Celebrity, Princess, and Holland America.

Luxury Lines

These offer the finest onboard accommodations, personalized service, and gourmet dining. Expect smaller, more intimate ships and itineraries visiting exclusive ports. Seabourn, Regent Seven Seas, and Silversea are popular luxury cruise lines.

Expedition Cruises

Take travelers to remote regions, often focusing on education and nature. Ships are smaller, with experts onboard offering lectures and leading excursions. For instance, in expedition cruises, most people travel to Antarctica, the Arctic, and the Galapagos Islands.

Choosing the Right Option: Yacht or Cruise

The best choice comes down to your priorities. Yachts reign supreme if you seek unmatched privacy, complete itinerary control, and ultra-luxurious amenities with personalized service.

Cruises win if you crave a social atmosphere, diverse onboard entertainment, pre-planned itineraries, and a greater cost-value proposition. They offer an easy, all-inclusive way to experience multiple destinations.

Consider your budget and whether you value intimate exclusivity or a vibrant onboard community. The answer to those questions will point you toward the perfect seafaring vacation.

Qazi Raza Ul Haq

My name is Raza and I am an experienced SEO content writer who loves to explore and seek adventure. I have over 8 years of experience in blogging and SEO content writing. I would be delighted to take you on a thrilling journey to discover the world of yacht rentals in Dubai, providing you with valuable insights and helpful tips.

PER HOUR Per Day

Browse our Yachts

Yacht vs Cruise Ship: Luxury Travel Choices

• January 24, 2024

Which is the Ultimate Luxury Travel Choice: Yacht or Cruise Ship?

Introduction

When it comes to luxury travel, there are various options available, but two that often stand out are yachts and cruise ships. Both offer unique and extravagant experiences, allowing travelers to explore the open waters in style. While some may argue that a yacht provides the epitome of luxury, others may argue that a cruise ship offers more amenities and entertainment options. So, which is the ultimate luxury travel choice? Let's dive deeper into the world of yachts and cruise ships to understand the distinct features and advantages each offers.

The Allure of a Yacht

For many, the thought of cruising on a private yacht elicits images of opulence and exclusivity. Yachts are often associated with the rich and famous, offering a level of privacy that can't be matched by a cruise ship. Imagine sailing through crystal-clear waters, surrounded by breathtaking views, and basking in the privacy of your own floating paradise.

A yacht provides a more intimate experience, allowing you to escape the crowds and enjoy a tailor-made vacation. With a dedicated crew catering to your every need, you can truly relax and unwind. Whether you desire a tranquil escape or an adventurous expedition, a yacht can fulfill your every desire. From remote islands to hidden coves, the possibilities for exploration are endless.

Advantages of a Cruise Ship

While yachts offer exclusivity, cruise ships provide a different kind of luxury – a floating city filled with entertainment, activities, and world-class amenities. With multiple dining options, theaters, casinos, spas, and shopping centers, cruise ships are like mini-resorts on water. They cater to a wide range of interests, ensuring there is something for everyone.

When it comes to variety, a cruise ship surpasses a yacht. With different destinations and itineraries, you can explore multiple countries and cities during a single trip. Additionally, cruise ships often have onboard pools and water parks, offering fun for families and groups. Whether you want to relax by the pool, catch a Broadway-style show, or engage in thrilling water sports, a cruise ship has it all.

The Ultimate Comparison: Yacht vs. Cruise Ship

Now that we have explored the allure of both yachts and cruise ships, let's delve deeper into a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision when planning your next luxury vacation.

1. Exclusivity and Privacy

One of the most significant advantages of a yacht is the exclusivity and privacy it offers. On a yacht, you have the freedom to sail to remote destinations away from the crowded tourist spots. You can escape the hustle and bustle of everyday life and enjoy serenity on the open waters. Additionally, a yacht allows you to customize your itinerary based on your preferences, ensuring a truly personalized experience.

On the other hand, cruise ships are known for their large capacity, accommodating thousands of passengers. While they do offer private cabins, the overall experience is more communal. You will be sharing the ship's facilities and common areas with a significant number of people. If you prefer a more intimate and secluded experience, a yacht is the way to go.

2. Range of Amenities and Activities

When it comes to amenities and activities, cruise ships take the lead. These floating resorts boast an impressive range of options to keep you entertained throughout your journey. From art galleries to fitness centers, mini-golf courses to rock climbing walls, cruise ships are designed to cater to all interests. You can indulge in spa treatments, attend cooking classes, participate in dance lessons, or simply relax by the pool with a refreshing cocktail.

While yachts offer luxurious amenities such as jacuzzis, sun decks, and even helipads, the range and scale of activities are more limited. Yachts are ideal for those seeking a peaceful and serene vacation, away from the hustle and bustle of a cruise ship. If you crave a dynamic and vibrant atmosphere with endless entertainment options, a cruise ship will provide the ultimate experience.

3. Dining Experiences

Both yachts and cruise ships offer exceptional dining experiences, but they differ in style. On a yacht, you can enjoy personalized menus created by world-class chefs, catering to your specific tastes and dietary requirements. Your onboard chef will prepare gourmet meals using the freshest ingredients, ensuring a culinary journey like no other. You can dine alfresco under the stars or inside a luxurious dining room, relishing every bite in a private setting.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, offer a plethora of dining options. From casual buffet-style restaurants to elegant fine dining establishments, you can choose from a wide range of cuisines and culinary experiences. Cruise ships often have renowned celebrity chefs on board, providing an opportunity to indulge in their creations. Whether you crave sushi, steak, or international delicacies, a cruise ship will satisfy your taste buds.

4. Exploration and Itineraries

When it comes to exploration, yachts offer unparalleled freedom and flexibility. With a yacht, you have the ability to chart your own course and explore off-the-beaten-path destinations that are inaccessible to larger ships. Yachts can navigate through narrow channels, secluded bays, and shallow waters. You can anchor near pristine beaches or remote islands, immersing yourself in the beauty of untouched nature. The intimate size of a yacht allows you to discover hidden gems that are often missed by larger vessels.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, offer a wide range of itineraries, taking you to multiple destinations in a single trip. From bustling cities to tropical paradises, you can experience the diversity of various ports of call. Cruise lines carefully curate their itineraries, ensuring you have ample time to explore each destination. While cruise ships may not have the flexibility of a yacht, they make up for it by offering a broader range of experiences.

In the end, choosing between a yacht and a cruise ship comes down to personal preferences and the type of luxury experience you seek. If you value privacy, exclusivity, and customizable itineraries, a yacht is the perfect choice. On the other hand, if you crave an abundance of amenities, entertainment options, and the chance to explore multiple destinations effortlessly, a cruise ship is your best bet.

Both yachts and cruise ships offer unique and luxurious experiences, catering to different tastes and preferences. Whether you desire a secluded escape or a vibrant journey filled with entertainment, there is an option that will suit your desires. So, weigh the pros and cons, consider your preferences, and embark on a luxury travel adventure that is tailor-made for you.

Remember, luxury is a subjective concept, and what matters most is how you define it. So, choose the option that aligns with your idea of the ultimate luxury and set sail on a remarkable journey that will create lifelong memories.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Hidden Treasures of Bhutan: Monasteries and Mountains

Mexican food vs american food: a flavorful culinary comparison, you may also like.

Bahamas vs Aruba: Caribbean Vacation Destinations

• February 14, 2024

Orange Beach vs Gulf Shores: Alabama Gulf Coast Destinations

Saint Petersburg vs Moscow: A Comparison

Tokyo Haneda vs Narita: Choosing the Best Airport

• February 13, 2024

Milan vs Florence: Exploring Italian Cities

Hermosa vs Bonita: Spanish Beach Comparison

Click on the button to load the content from www.googletagmanager.com.

Load content

• Tailored Vacation Planner
• Cabin Yacht Charter
• Family Sailing Holidays
• Romantic Sailing Vacations For Couples
• Sailing with friends
• Greece all inclusive yacht charter
• Croatia all inclusive yacht charter
• Food & Wine Routes
• Yacht search
• Luxury sailing

Boat vs. Ship vs Yacht: What’s the Difference?

Language is a tricky thing, and picking out the differences between similar terms can be confusing. This is especially true when some of the definitions overlap. This is the case with the case of boat vs. ship vs. yacht . What’s the difference? We know in our gut that there are differences between these three seafaring vessels, but unless you’re a harbor master do you really know what counts as what?

Let’s get into some definitions, and we’re going to start with the easiest to explain: What is a yacht? What is a ship? And what is a boat?

Yacht vs. Ship vs. Boat

What is a yacht.

A yacht, I think everyone would agree, is fancier than a ship or a boat. “Yacht” infers some amount of luxury , and definitely recreation. There’s also something to be said about size. A yacht tends to be anywhere between 35 feet up to 160 feet. And some yachts, known as superyachts, go even beyond that. (Jeff Bezos just built a 417 foot yacht, but that’s really breaking yacht records.)

Because of the size, yachts tend to operate in larger bodies of water–generally the ocean. Yachts are able to handle rougher ocean waves, and they are also equipped with more advanced navigation and guidance instruments than smaller boats. Likewise, a yacht tends to have a full crew to help with the navigation, engineering, repairs, as well as having stewards that serve the yacht’s guests. This can be anywhere from a crew of four or five up to a crew of a few dozen on large yachts. 

One interesting thing to note is that outside of the United States, a yacht refers to a sailboat , and a motorized yacht is called a “motor yacht”. 

So, is a yacht a boat? Yes, technically a yacht is a boat. But a yacht is a very specific kind of boat.

Want to hop aboard?

Book your dream sailing vacation in top sailing destinations!

• Explore your charter options

What is a Ship?

The term ship is most commonly associated with a very large boat, and something that is not as fancy as a yacht (one exception is that cruise ships can still be very fancy, but are referred to as ships because of their size and power.)

Ships are generally so large that they would never be found in a lake, with some exceptions for the Great Lakes, and are made for navigating the high seas of the open ocean. An ship can refer to a cruise ship, a naval ship, a tanker, a container ship, and many other commercial vessels.

Ships tend to have advanced navigation and technology, but much more advanced than that of a yacht due to the size, the speed, and the routes that a ship will take. They are meant to be traversing the open ocean for very long periods of time, from one continent to the next, while a yacht may only rarely set across the ocean and most often stays somewhat near land. 

A ship will also have a much larger crew than a yacht or a boat. Ships are typically so large that they need not only one trained navigator but a set of navigators, plus an entire engineering team, and includes many more positions. 

Finally, a ship is meant to carry things. This may be passengers, yes (in reference to cruise ships and some navy ships) but most ships are for carrying cargo–or even carrying equipment to do work on other ships including repair work or refueling. 

What is a Boat?

Well, a boat is harder to define, because a yacht is technically a boat, and a ship is technically a boat. But when people refer to boats, they are almost always referring to something smaller than either a yacht or a ship. Boats may be motorized, like a speed boat, or they may sail, or they may be man-powered, like a rowboat or a kayak. Really, anything up to and including a liferaft, can be called a boat.

(As a side note that will just muddy the waters even further, submarine captains are adamant that their subs are boats. They are not ships.)

So, Boat vs. Ship Vs. Yacht?

Ultimately it comes down to this: all three of them are boats, but yachts are fancier, larger, and used for recreation, and ships are even larger, used commercially or by the navy, and are meant to cross oceans. The dividing line is sometimes thin, but generally speaking, when it comes to boats vs. ships.vs. yachts you can go by the adage “ I know it when I see it .”

Share article:

Have a question.

We have answers to your questions. So don’t hesitate to get in touch with our team today!

• GET MORE INFO

Feel free to ask us anything. All hands on deck. Let's sail

Thank you for sending us an inquiry, thank you so much for your enquiry.

8 Differences Between Yacht and Cruise Ship

When most people think of a yacht, they picture a large, luxurious vessel, usually used for pleasure cruises or racing. However, there are many different types and sizes of yachts, and they can be used for a variety of purposes.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, are much larger than yachts and are designed specifically for carrying passengers on vacation cruises. Before going for the difference between yacht and cruise ship, let’s see what they are:

What Is Yacht Ship?

A yacht is a vessel used for pleasure trips, cruising, or racing. It can be either motorized or sailed and is designed for recreational use. A yacht is generally larger than a powerboat and has a cabin and one or more bathrooms.

Yachts can range in size from 20 feet (6.1 m) to over 200 feet (61 m). The term mega yacht typically refers to yachts over 80 feet (24 m). Some yachts are used exclusively for charter, while others are privately owned and used for both chartering and personal use.

Yacht ship is a term that is sometimes used to refer to a very large yacht, but it is not an official designation.

Types of Yacht Ship

A yacht is a vessel used for recreation or pleasure, typically propelled by sailing or motor power and used for cruising or racing. There are many different types of yachts, from small sailing boats to large luxury motor yachts. Here is a look at some of the different types of yachts:

• Sailing Yachts: Sailing yachts are vessels that are propelled by wind power. These yachts typically have one or more masts and sails. They range in size from small racing boats to large cruising yachts.
• Motor Yachts : Motor yachts are vessels that are propelled by motor power, typically diesel engines. These yachts can range in size from small pleasure boats to large luxury yachts.
• Catamarans: Catamarans are two-hulled vessels, typically with two parallel hulls of equal size. These vessels are stable and efficient and are popular for both pleasure cruising and racing.
• Trimarans: Trimarans are three-hulled vessels, typically with two smaller hulls flanking a larger central hull. These vessels are stable and efficient and are also popular for both pleasure cruising and racing.
• Luxury Yachts: Luxury yachts are motor yachts that are typically larger than 80 feet in length and have a host of high-end amenities, such as multiple staterooms, a spacious saloon, and a flybridge. These yachts are designed for ultimate luxury and comfort.

What Is a Cruise Ship?

A cruise ship is a large, ocean-going vessel designed for carrying passengers on extended voyages, typically of several weeks’ duration or longer, and for providing them with amenities and activities comparable to those found at resorts or hotels on land.

Most cruise ships are owned by large corporations and are operated as part of a vacation package sold by a cruise line. They carry thousands of passengers and crew members and are some of the largest ships in the world.

Types of Cruise Ship

Cruise ships come in all shapes and sizes, from small and intimate vessels to large and lavish ones. There are many different types of cruise ships, each with its own unique features and amenities. Here is a look at some of the most popular types of cruise ships:

• Mega Ships: These are the largest and most lavish cruise ships in the world. They boast an array of features and amenities, including multiple restaurants, bars, pools, casinos, spas, and more.
• Luxury Ships: Luxury cruise ships offer a more upscale experience, with smaller passenger capacities and a higher ratio of crew to passengers. These ships typically have fewer public areas and focus more on providing a relaxing and intimate experience
• Family Ships: Family cruise ships are designed to provide a fun and safe environment for families with children. These ships usually have a wide variety of kid-friendly activities, as well as childcare services.
• Adventure Ships: Adventure cruise ships are designed for passengers who want to get up close and personal with nature. These ships typically sail to remote and exotic destinations and offer a wide range of activities such as hiking, biking, kayaking, and more.
• River Ships: River cruise ships are smaller vessels that sail on rivers and canals. These ships offer a more intimate experience, with a smaller passenger capacity and a lower ratio of crew to passengers. River cruise ships often have fewer public areas and focus more on providing a relaxing and intimate experience.

Difference Between Yacht and Cruise Ship

1.  size.

When it comes to size, there is a big difference between a yacht and a cruise ship. A yacht is a small, private vessel used for pleasure or sport, while a cruise ship is a large vessel used for carrying passengers on long voyages.

Both types of vessels have their own unique features and amenities, but the size difference is the most notable.

A typical yacht is between 30 and 100 feet long, with most falling in the 40-60-foot range. Yachts are much narrower than cruise ships, with a beam (width) of only about 12-15 feet.

2.  Engine

Yacht engines are typically located in the back of the vessel, while cruise ship engines are typically located in the front. This is because yachts need to have a low center of gravity for speed and maneuverability, while cruise ships need to have a high center of gravity for stability.

Yacht engines typically have a higher power-to-weight ratio than cruise ship engines. This is because yachts need more power to achieve high speeds, while cruise ships need more stability and, therefore, can afford to have a heavier engine.

3.  Passenger Capacity

Cruise ships definitely have the upper hand. The largest of these vessels can carry over 5,000 passengers, while even the biggest yachts only have room for around 100 guests.

You’ll find everything from casinos and nightclubs to multiple restaurants and swimming pools on a cruise ship, while most yachts only have a few basic amenities.

4.  Crew

The type of work that is expected of the crew also differs between yachts and cruise ships. On a yacht, the crew is responsible for everything from cooking and cleaning to maintenance and repairs.

They also have to be prepared to deal with any emergencies that may arise. On a cruise ship, the crew is responsible for providing entertainment and activities for the passengers, as well as keeping the ship clean.

5.  Ports of Call

Cruise ships are much larger than yachts, so they can visit a wider range of ports. This means that you will have more options for shore excursions and activities. However, it also means that you will be spending more time on the ship than you would on a yacht.

Yachts are smaller and more intimate, so they can visit more remote and exclusive ports. This means that you will have a more personalized experience, but you will also have fewer options for things to do.

6.  Cabins & Activities

When it comes to cabins, yacht cabins are typically smaller than cruise ship cabins. However, they are also more luxurious, with higher-end finishes and amenities. Yacht cabins often have a more modern design than cruise ship cabins, which tend to be more traditional. Yacht cabins also have a higher price tag than cruise ship cabins.

When it comes to activities, both yacht and cruise ships offer a variety of options. However, yachts tend to focus more on luxury and leisure, while cruise ships offer a wider range of activities, including educational programming, live entertainment, and casino gaming.

7.  Dining

On a yacht, you will typically have the option to dine in the main dining room, or you can choose to have your meals delivered to your stateroom. There is also the option to dine on the deck, weather permitting. The food on a yacht is usually of a higher quality than that on a cruise ship, as the chefs can use fresher and more expensive ingredients.

On a cruise ship, there are typically more dining options available, including buffet-style and formal sit-down restaurants. The food on a cruise ship is usually of a lower quality than that on a yacht, as the chefs have to cook for a larger number of people and often use frozen or canned ingredients.

8.  Cost

Yacht tickets are generally much more expensive than cruise ship tickets due to the smaller capacity and higher demand. However, travelers should keep in mind that the overall cost of a yacht vacation will likely be lower than the cost of a cruise ship vacation since yachts typically include all meals and activities in the ticket price.

Yachts typically have a smaller number of staterooms than cruise ships, which means that they fill up more quickly and are often more expensive to book.

However, travelers should keep in mind that yacht staterooms are often more luxurious than cruise ship staterooms, so the overall cost may be worth it for those looking for a truly luxurious vacation experience.

Final Words

I hope you found this article helpful in understanding the difference between yacht and cruise ships. If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to ask.

Saiful Emon is the founder and editor of Sun Sea Skis , a sailing blog for adventure seekers. He loves sailing, traveling, and sharing his experiences with others. He also writes about fitness, wellness, business, and marketing in his spare time!

What Is a Cruising Sailboat? Everything You Need to Know

Sailing must haves for your next adventure, leave a comment cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Please use a modern browser to view this website. Some elements might not work as expected when using Internet Explorer.

• Why Charter Homepage
• Luxury Yacht Vacation Types
• Corporate Yacht Charter
• Tailor Made Vacations
• Luxury Exploration Vacations
• ALL 3,654 Yachts For Charter
• Motor Yachts
• Sailing Yachts
• Classic Yachts
• Catamaran Yachts
• Special Offers
• by Destination
• Yacht Reviews
• Destination Guides
• Inspiration & Features
• Mediterranean Charter Yachts
• France Charter Yachts
• Italy Charter Yachts
• Croatia Charter Yachts
• Greece Charter Yachts
• Turkey Charter Yachts
• Bahamas Charter Yachts
• Caribbean Charter Yachts
• Australia Charter Yachts
• Thailand Charter Yachts
• Dubai Charter Yachts
• Destination News
• New To Fleet
• Charter Fleet Updates
• Industry News
• Yacht Shows
• Corporate Charter
• Charter Advice
• Why Use a Yacht Broker
• Charter Costs Explained
• Add my yacht
• Yacht Charter Fleet
• Questions & Answers
• What's the difference between a yacht charter and a cruise ship?

I went on a vacation on a cruise ship last year and my other half has been talking about booking a yacht charter for our next holiday. What exactly is the difference between a yacht charter and a cruise ship vacation?

Editorial Team

To make it simple, think about it with the following analogy : Whilst a cruise ship is like a hotel, with rooms to book and passengers being issued tickets for a predetermined itinerary, a yacht is like a villa, where the charterer(s) rent the space as a whole, no matter how many people are actually hosted, and will decide how they want to make use of the facility for the duration of the rental. Beyond this practical difference, there is simply no comparison between a holiday on a cruise ship, amidst hundreds of others passengers, and a charter experience onboard a private yacht that takes you where you want to go, and will only accommodate the family and friends you have invited to join you onboard.

Ask a question

Have you got a charter question you want answered?

Questions & Answer Toipcs

• Chartering a Yacht
• Destinations
• Corporate Charters
• Charter Yacht Insurance
• Top worldwide events
• Safety, Rules & Regulations
• Most popular Charters
• Travelling safety
• Yachting Terminology
• Charting a sailing yacht
• Charter Itineraries
• Captain & Crew

Featured Luxury Yachts for Charter

This is a small selection of the global luxury yacht charter fleet, with 3654 motor yachts, sail yachts, explorer yachts and catamarans to choose from including superyachts and megayachts, the world is your oyster. Why search for your ideal yacht charter vacation anywhere else?

136m | Lurssen

from $4,288,000 p/week ♦︎

115m | Lurssen

from $2,787,000 p/week ♦︎

85m | Golden Yachts

from $965,000 p/week ♦︎

88m | Golden Yachts

from $1,179,000 p/week ♦︎

84m | Feadship

from $1,072,000 p/week ♦︎

93m | Feadship

from $1,501,000 p/week ♦︎

Maltese Falcon

88m | Perini Navi

from $490,000 p/week

122m | Lurssen

from $3,000,000 p/week

As Featured In

The YachtCharterFleet Difference

YachtCharterFleet makes it easy to find the yacht charter vacation that is right for you. We combine thousands of yacht listings with local destination information, sample itineraries and experiences to deliver the world's most comprehensive yacht charter website.

San Francisco

• Like us on Facebook
• Follow us on X
• Follow us on Instagram
• Find us on LinkedIn
• Add My Yacht
• Affiliates & Partners

Popular Destinations & Events

• St Tropez Yacht Charter
• Monaco Yacht Charter
• St Barts Yacht Charter
• Greece Yacht Charter
• Mykonos Yacht Charter
• Caribbean Yacht Charter

Featured Charter Yachts

• Maltese Falcon Yacht Charter
• Wheels Yacht Charter
• Victorious Yacht Charter
• Andrea Yacht Charter
• Titania Yacht Charter
• Ahpo Yacht Charter

Receive our latest offers, trends and stories direct to your inbox.

Please enter a valid e-mail.

Thanks for subscribing.

Search for Yachts, Destinations, Events, News... everything related to Luxury Yachts for Charter.

Yachts in your shortlist

• Difference Between Yacht and Cruise Ship

A vacation at sea appears to be the ideal getaway. Guests can enjoy the open ocean while exploring beautiful coastal destinations aboard a sailing yacht, catamaran, or cruise ship. When it comes to a seafaring holiday, travelers have two options: A cruise ship vs. a yacht charter. Although these types of vacations share some similarities, they couldn’t be more different.

Table Summary

Definitions

A superyacht, sometimes known as a mega yacht, is a high-end, privately owned sailing or motor vessel with a professional crew. Depending on the owner’s fortune, a super yacht may tour the world, winter in the South Pacific, or spend the summer in the Mediterranean.

A cruise ship is just one of many ships in a fleet owned by large companies like Carnival Cruise Lines or Norwegian Cruise Lines. A cruise ship is in service all year and may only be out of commission for a few weeks when it is docked for routine maintenance. A cruise ship will usually travel to Alaska or Europe in the summer and the Caribbean in the winter.

Yacht VS Cruise Ship

Private yacht vacations provide a sense of security that cruise ships cannot. Onboard, your guests will enjoy an intimate experience that leaves worries behind and welcomes 5-star, personalized service and attention. Private yachts offer a whole new level of luxury and solitude. You are just another passenger on a cruise ship, but on a private yacht, you are the only one on whom the staff must concentrate. When it comes to cruise ship safety vs. yacht safety, yachts are far safer than cruise ships.

Yacht vs. Cruise — What's the Difference?

Difference Between Yacht and Cruise

Table of contents, key differences, comparison chart, primary use, operational cost, compare with definitions, common curiosities, do yachts and cruise ships follow similar safety regulations, how do the environmental impacts of yachts and cruise ships compare, what type of crew is required for a yacht compared to a cruise ship, are yachts or cruise ships more affected by weather conditions, how does the onboard dining experience differ between yachts and cruise ships, how do maintenance costs compare between owning a yacht and operating a cruise ship, what entertainment options are available on yachts versus cruise ships, can both yachts and cruise ships be used for special events, what are the booking and planning processes like for yachts versus cruises, how do the privacy levels compare between yachts and cruise ships, what destinations are typically available for yacht charters versus cruise routes, can yachts navigate narrower or more shallow waterways compared to cruise ships, how does the experience of time at sea differ between yachts and cruise ships, what types of cabins can be found on yachts compared to cruise ships, what kind of training do crew members need for yachts compared to cruise ships, share your discovery.

Author Spotlight

Popular Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

New Comparisons

Trending Terms

“Boat” vs. “Ship”: Chart A Course To Understand The Difference

• Boat Vs. Ship
• Yacht Vs. Boat

Ahoy, me hearties! A true seadog worth their salt would never let aboard a landlubber who calls their ship a boat . That kind of mixup is the talk that gets you walking the plank!

In this article, we’ll sail the seven seas of nautical knowledge to define the difference between the words ship and boat , explain what they refer to in technical and casual use, provide examples of different kinds of both ships and boats , and we’ll even clear up the meaning of the word yacht .

🚢 Quick summary

In casual use, the word boat is often used to refer to any watergoing vessel, regardless of its size or how it’s powered. However, large oceanfaring watercraft—those that use multiple sails or engines—are more properly called ships . In contrast, the word ship isn’t commonly applied to smaller craft. The word yacht is typically used to refer to any larger noncommercial vessel—one used for sailing or other recreation, as opposed to business.

What’s the difference between a boat and a ship ?

By definition, a boat is “a vessel for transport by water,” “a small ship,” or “a vessel of any size built for navigation of rivers or inland bodies of water.” In casual use, the word boat is used to refer to any vehicle used to travel on the water—anything from a canoe to an ocean liner.

In this kind of casual and general usage, the word boat is often used to refer to watercraft of all sizes and types, as you can see in the variety of terms that include the word, such as sailboat , motorboat , fishing boat , rowboat , tugboat , paddleboat , and lifeboat .

In contrast, the word ship is typically reserved to refer to a large, ocean-faring vessel propelled by multiple sails or engines.

(Of course, the word ship is also used to refer to large, nonwater craft, such as airship and spaceship .)

In technical, nautical contexts, the word ship sometimes specifically refers to a sailing vessel that has three or more square masts. As is the case with boat , though, the word ship is applied in the name of a variety of large watercrafts, including cruise ship , cargo ship , pirate ship , battleship , longship , and steamship .

Go Behind The Words!

• By clicking "Sign Up", you are accepting Dictionary.com Terms & Conditions and Privacy policies.
• Comments This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In contexts where it’s important to distinguish the difference, the distinction made between ship and boat is typically based on the size of the craft being discussed and if it is used only for ocean or sea travel. Additionally, the word boat can refer to vessels that don’t have any sails or engines, such as a kayak or a rowboat, whereas the word ship usually refers to vessels with many sails or large engines. Even in casual usage, it’s very uncommon for someone to call a small craft a ship , unless they’re doing so jokingly.

One distinction made in nautical contexts is that the word ship often refers to vessels too large to fit inside other vessels. By contrast, the word boat is often used to refer to smaller craft that can fit inside larger ones. For example, a massive cruise ship may have a large number of lifeboats inside it.

What are you sailing? An ocean or a sea ? Learn the difference here.

Yacht vs. boat

The word yacht typically refers to a vessel used for private, noncommercial reasons (those other than business), such as sailing or racing. As a general term, the word yacht can refer to any watercraft that isn’t intended to be used to make money, which includes anything from racing sailboats to billionaires’ floating ultra-luxury mansions.

The word yacht is not used to refer to small vessels, such as row boats or canoes. In casual usage, a yacht may be referred to with the more general terms boat or ship , but certainly not all ships and boats are yachts .

What's the difference between "uncharted" and "unchartered" territory?

Commonly Confused

Trending Words

[ e ploo - ri-b oo s oo -n oo m ]

• Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

• The Inventory
• Beyond Cars

When Is a Ship a Yacht, and When Is It Not?

The difference between the two broad categories is determined by one key factor..

Yachts have been in the news a lot more frequently in recent years. There have been stories like when a Dutch yacht builder requested to temporarily dismantle an iconic bridge in Rotterdam to get a 417-foot-long sailing yacht commissioned by Jeff Bezos out to sea, or when authorities around the world seized the yachts of Russian oligarchs in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Usually, the most notable yachts have the prefixes super-, mega- and even giga- attached to convey their truly enormous sizes relative to most other privately-owned vessels.

Suggested Reading

As a result, ‘yacht’ as a term has basically become meaningless just by the sheer proliferation of private ships in recent years that defy all potential superlatives. It’s like when you say a word so often that it loses all its meaning. Why are there so many more huge luxury maritime vessels in the world? Rising levels of global wealth inequality? Technical innovation? I don’t know. The Pangeos is the latest planned monument to ostentatious wealth. The 1970-foot-long turtle-shaped ship is the brainchild of Italian designer Pierpaolo Lazzarini. However, this self-declared terayacht is not a yacht by definition.

Related Content

The only distinction between a yacht and a ship is simple: It is the vessel’s intended purpose. When you enter a foreign country, every customs agent will ask, “What is the purpose of your trip, business or pleasure?” It is the same when categorizing large water vehicles. The sole purpose of a yacht is recreation. If the craft has any other intended purpose, such as naval warfare or maritime commerce, it’s a ship. The U.S.S. Gerald R. Ford , a nuclear-powered U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, and the Carnival Celebration, a 5,280-passenger Carnival cruise ship , are both ships.

The plans for the Pangeos might feature private vacation villas and apartments. However, the absurd craft would also include also shopping malls and a hotel resort, making the Pangeos a ship. The Pangeos, named after the prehistoric supercontinent of Pangea, will likely never be built due to the ship’s $8 billion price tag.

Besides ship and yacht, boat is another commonly used term. The definition of a boat is much more vague and open to interpretation. Boats tend to be small personal craft and only carry a few people. Though, it’s common for sailors to refer to vessels of any size or purpose as a boat.

What is the difference between crewing cruise ships and super yachts?

Cruise ships and super yachts are both large vessels that are staffed by crew members who make sure things are running smoothly.

Don't let that statement fool you, though—the experience of working on each vessel is quite different. In this article, we'll explore some key differences between working on a cruise ship and working on a super yacht.

Let's dive in!

Cruise Ships vs. Super Yachts: Specifications

The first thing to note is that cruise ships are generally much larger than super yachts. The average cruise ship is about 900 feet (ca. 274 meters) long, while the average super yacht is only about 150 feet (ca. 46 meters) long.

This difference in size means that there are also differences in the number of crew members. A typical cruise ship will have a crew of around 800 to 1,500 people, while a typical super yacht will have a crew of about 10 to 20 people.

Cruise Ships vs. Super Yachts: Work Hours

Another key difference between working on a cruise ship and working on a super yacht is the work hours. On a cruise ship, crew members typically work long hours—up to 10 hours per day—and will have they often have to work on weekends and holidays.

On a super yacht, crew members usually work around 8-10 hours per day, and they typically have more time off, dependant on the yacht’s itinerary. This difference is due in part to the fact that cruise ships carry more passengers and offer more amenities, including:

• restaurants
• live entertainment

On a super yacht, on the other hand, the focus is more on luxury and relaxation, so there can be fewer work hours.

Cruise Ships vs. Super Yachts: Work Environment

The work environment is another area where cruise ships and super yachts differ. On a cruise ship, the work environment is fast-paced. There are usually large numbers of passengers, and things do get busy.

On a super yacht, the work environment is typically more relaxed. There is often a higher crew to guest ratio, meaning there are more people to handle the workload. And the fact that there are fewer people in general makes for a quieter atmosphere.

That said, cruise ships typically offer their crew members dedicated crew areas for relaxation, while super yachts typically do not.

Cruise Ships vs. Super Yachts: Salaries

Finally, let's talk about salaries. Crew members on cruise ships typically earn less than crew members on super yachts.

This is due in part to the fact that super yacht owners are typically looking for crew members with exceptional maritime skills and experience. They are also willing to pay more for luxury and exclusivity.

Of course, salaries vary depending on the specific cruise ship or super yacht, so it's always best to do your research before applying for a job.

What Are the Requirements for Crew on a Cruise Ship or Super Yacht?

Now that we've gone over some key differences between working on a cruise ship and working on a super yacht, you might be wondering what requirements you need to meet in order to work on either one.

For the most part, there are very few formal requirements for entry level positions. You'll need:

• a valid passport
• a seafarers medical exam
• a STCW Basic Training certificate
• a firm grasp of the English language

However, these are the bare minimum requirements. If you're looking for a higher-level position, such as a management or officer mate position, you'll need additional experience and qualifications.

It's also important to note that most cruise lines and super yacht owners prefer to hire crew members who have experience working in customer service.

Finally, it's worth mentioning that many cruise lines and super yacht owners require their crew members to sign a contract. This contract can last for up to 6-8 months, and it can typically include a clause that requires you to pay back the cost of any training the company has paid, should you leave the job early.

How To Land a Job on a Cruise Ship or Super Yacht

1. find opportunities.

If you're interested in working on a cruise ship or super yacht, the first thing you need to do is search online for job postings on our website.

2. Complete Your Application

Once you've found a job listing that interests you, the next step is to complete your application. Ensure that you have an up to date resume to submit as part of your application.

If there are any requirements that you don't meet (e.g., STCW Basic Training certification), you'll need to take care of those before you can complete this step. Luckily, there are plenty of maritime skills academies (such as the Maritime Skills Academy ) that can help you get up to speed.

3. Interview and Training

After you've submitted your application, the next step is an interview.

For cruise ship jobs, this will likely be a video interview with a hiring manager - but every cruise line is different. For super yacht jobs, the interview process is less systematic.

You might have an in-person meeting with the captain or owner of the yacht, followed by a trial period where you'll work as a deckhand or stewardess to see if you're a good fit for the job.

Join a Crew Today!

If you're interested in working on a cruise ship or super yacht, now is the perfect time to start your job search !

Both industries are booming, and there are plenty of opportunities for motivated individuals with the right skills and qualifications. Just remember to do your research before applying for any job, and don't forget to complete your STCW Basic Training certification—it's one of the most important requirements for any maritime job.

Sign Up For News & Updates

• Terms & Conditions " required=""> I agree to your Terms & Conditions *

• Industry Updates
• General Boating News
• Something Else
• I am happy to receive email updates from Viking Crew
• I agree to your Terms & Conditions

Ready To Apply?

Apply with 1 click with your viking crew account..

Don't have one? Click below to register and complete your profile

Email Address

Remember Me

Register With Viking

Search saved.

Manage your search preferences in your user profile

Thankyou for your message.

We aim to respond to all queries within 24 hours. Still looking for the perfect job? Start a search now

Thank you for signing up, keep an eye on your inbox. Ready to start your job search?

• Our Clients
• Our Offices
• Associations & Accreditations
• Crew Your New Build Yacht Projects
• Yacht Services Overview
• Funding and Grants
• Maritime Labour Convention (MLC)
• Green Crew Pathway
• Mental Health & Wellbeing
• Women in Maritime
• MCA Wellbeing at Sea Tool
• Newsletters

• 672 Wine Club
• Motorcycles
• Car of the Month
• Destinations
• Men’s Fashion
• Watch Collector
• Art & Collectibles
• Vacation Homes
• Celebrity Homes
• New Construction
• Home Design
• Electronics
• Fine Dining
• Dubai Tourism
• Gateway Bronco
• On Location – Olympic Games Paris 2024
• One&Only
• The Ritz-Carlton, Kapalua
• Saratoga Spring Water
• Sports & Leisure
• Health & Wellness
• Best of the Best
• The Ultimate Gift Guide

10 Superyacht Concepts With Outrageous Features, From a 560-Foot Track to a Private Marina

Want the world's largest floating structure or a ufo-style vessel with a glassed-in owner's suite these designs range from fantasy to buildable tomorrow., julia zaltzman, julia zaltzman's most recent stories.

• This Boatmaker Builds 1960s-Inspired Cruisers With a Modern Twist. Here’s How.
• This 150-Foot Fishing Trawler Was Transformed Into a Rugged Explorer Yacht
• These 3 Miniature Explorer Yachts Are Ready to Take You Off-Grid
• Share This Article

Among the most outrageous yachts ever built, Sailing Yacht A and Yas are top of the list. The polarizing designs are defined by their exteriors— A for its fortress aesthetic and the former navy frigate Yas for its dolphin-like appearance. Love them or loathe them, they break from conventional yacht design and show what can be done with a little fresh thinking. That’s exactly what concepts are intended to do, and some of the world’s most outrageous examples take it to the extreme.

“Yacht concepts drive human evolution in maritime adventure,” says Micca Ferrero, owner of ICON Yachts . “It is one of the oldest and purest forms of work, as humans have been preparing to take to the sea for centuries in search of a better world. Each concept carries a small part of our future at sea.”

But the concepts have gone beyond simple sea vessels. From the Airyacht, with its detachable upper blimp structure, to U-Boat Worx’s Nautilus that can travel underwater at 10 knots, superyachts are no longer limited to the surface. Shape, size, amenities and propulsion are all up for grabs, and some of the most eyebrow-raising examples pave the way for the yachts of tomorrow.

Here are 10 of our favorite outrageous yacht concepts ever launched.

Pangeos — The World’s Largest Floating Structure

Italian design studio Lazzarini is known for its far-fetched ideas, which include a swan-shaped yacht and floating seaports. Pangeos is its interpretation of the world’s largest floating structure. The 1,800-foot-long “terayacht” (which also measures 2,000 feet across at its widest point) is named after Pangea, a supercontinent that existed 335 million years ago. This Pangea is estimated to accommodate 60,000 guests. The premise is an emissions-free city that can sail around the world. Designed in the shape of a giant turtle clad in solar panels, the concept includes multiple structures with a rooftop shopping mall, restaurants, and houses. There are also gardens, pools, and a large beach club, as well as helipads, hangars and marinas to store helicopters, toys, and tenders. Pangeos is powered by nine electric motors of 16,800 hp each, with the “wings” drawing more power from the waves and wind. Lazzarini estimates the build cost would be $8 billion.

VY.01 — Standout Feature: Indoor Garden

Gardens and superyachts don’t typically mix. It can be challenging to keep plants alive at sea since gardening requires substantial care and resources. But that didn’t stop German architects 3deluxe from penning VY.01 , a low carbon-emission superyacht concept with a greenhouse and vegetable garden. Billed as a “paradisiacal biotope,” the concept catamaran focuses on onboard self-sufficiency. In addition to a hydrogen fuel-cell system and electric propulsion, the vessel has solar panels on the rooftop to generate clean energy for the seawater desalination system that provides water for the plants. Other features include large deck spaces, open-plan living, a saltwater pool, and a mini marina for tenders and toys.

Domus — Standout Feature: An Experimental Open Plan Layout

This 131-foot-long solar sailing trimaran by Rob Doyle Design and Van Geest has 8,500 square feet of interior space, more than double the volume of other yachts with similar lengths. Domus , meaning a single-story home divided into two parts, is defined by a flat and wide superstructure, containing multiple guest areas that lead to a central atrium. The full-beam design is spread across two decks, with two owner’s suites that each have adjoining salons. There is also a cinema, gym, spa, and pool. When sailing, Domus will be able to heel at an angle of two degrees to reduce drag while also guaranteeing a comfortable guest experience with minimal rolling. It also uses a combination of solar power, hydro-regeneration technology, and hydrogen fuel cells for unlimited range and zero emissions. If that’s not enough, it’s fitted with a sail for extra wind power.

EXPV — Standout Feature: Floating Glass Walkway Connecting Two Deckhouses

Over the years, Feadship has developed engineered yacht concepts that not only bring something new to yacht design, but also are ready to be built. The 285-foot EXPV , which the Dutch yard developed in collaboration with British studio Harrison Eidsgaard, is an explorer with a difference. The vessel has two deckhouses connected by a suspended glass walkway that separates the private owner’s quarters from the guest areas. The full-beam owner’s apartment, measuring 44 feet across, has an observation room, a helideck, and a private foredeck sun lounge. The other six guest cabins face the sea. On the lower deck, the beach club has folding platforms on both sides, an indoor swimming pool, and a skylight. A tender deck is located directly below. The mast holds a two-person pod that travels above the radar domes for exceptional views. The yacht also has hybrid diesel-electric propulsion.

Cantharus — Standout Feature: Underwater Lounge

Cantharus is about being immersed in nature. American designer Darin Osborne’s Cantharus is a vessel with unrestricted views of the ocean, above and below deck, to encourage guests to be at one with their surroundings. The 226-foot concept has an underwater lounge and office amidship that converts into an owner’s cabin. The space holds a piano, formal dining table, and entertainment system. More panoramic vistas are on the upper bridge. On the main deck aft, there is a Jacuzzi that doubles as a stage, and a bar and DJ booth. At night, underwater lights illuminate the ocean, shining a spotlight on the behemoths of the deep.

Galileo² — Standout Feature: A Private Marina

Described as the “catamaran that costs $500 billion to build,” the 656-foot Galileo² stretches the imagination in all directions. German naval architects Beiderbeck Designs, whose most notable builds include the 305-foot Eos and 233-foot Skat , conceived the multihull during the pandemic. It was clearly ahead of its time. Equipped with a methanol powerplant, it also has a 19,000-nautical-mile range, a retractable restaurant, and a 262-foot pier for the 38 guests to take walks at sea. Along with 75 crew, the yacht has a private marina with 260 feet of dock space—enough for 25 boats, submersibles, and toys. Other key features include an outdoor cinema, a hospital, and an Olympic-sized swimming pool.

Phoenicia — Standout Feature: Articulated Helipad

Igor Lobanov’s sailing concept Phoenicia catches the eye with a reverse bow, a raised bowsprit, and an Arabian-inspired cutout on the superstructure that casts shadows across the yacht’s exterior decks. Even more dramatic are the masts on the main deck behind a glass-walled gallery. The yacht, a bridge between old and new, fuses a large traditional sail rig with an articulated helipad that unfolds from the roof of the owner’s suite. At night, 33 laser lights shine into the water, giving the impression that the yacht has two decks of oars.

Project L — Standout Feature: An Underwater Glass-Encased Owner’s Suite

French designer Thierry Gauguin is a long-time collaborator of Philippe Starck, with projects that include Venus , the 260-foot Feadship built for Steve Jobs. His ultra-modern 394-foot concept Project L is his first solo design. Conceived for long, oceangoing passages with diesel-electric propulsion, it is fitted out with a glass-encased underwater owner’s suite at the bow. The bullet-like exterior blends the naval architecture of a sailing vessel with motoryacht convenience. Outdoor deck areas are limited to the small sun deck and an extendable beach club at the stern, both of which have pools. Yet the design also includes a dinghy bay, a heliport, a car garage, and even an underwater escape pod for Bond-like exits.

Ocean Odyssey — Standout Feature: A 590-Foot Running Track

Penned by Italian designer Marco Casali as part of his 2020 “Owner for a Day” initiative, the 360-foot Ocean Odyssey is a floating hub of operations based on features requested by a yachting journalist. The vessel is defined by a two-level glass superstructure, which conceals a high-tech media center and a signature 590-foot running track. Its two-level stern works as a swimming pool (with lounges) on the upper-level beach club), as well as a private port to accommodate a custom 50-foot tender in a floating slip. More seating is found on the foredeck and bridge deck, while a helipad on the top deck allows for easy guest transfer anywhere in the world.

Protean 95 — Standout Feature: An Adaptive Platform

The 312-foot Protean 95 is all about flexibility. Designed by Dutch studio CBSPRO Maritime to meet a variety of owners’ needs, it can be used as a support vessel, an explorer yacht, or a mothership for sportfishing tournaments and sailing regattas. The hybrid electric yacht can also serve as a floating laboratory and research vessel for oceanographic expeditions, helped by its 8,000-nautical-mile range. The open aft deck is a multifaceted heli-facility that can accommodate an 18-passenger helicopter. It also has a helipad, under-deck equipment hangar, and refueling area, as well as space for a submersible, multiple tenders and other pleasure craft. Amenities for the 20 guests include a spa, gym, cinema, and pool.

Read More On:

More marine.

Uber Is Letting Riders Book Private Yachts and Water Limos in Europe

This 134-Foot Superyacht With a Glass-Edged Infinity Pool Could Be Yours for a Cool $26.5 Million

Candela and Polestar’s First Electric Foiling Boat Was Just Delivered—and It’s a Stunner

This New 174-Foot Custom Superyacht Doubles as Floating Garage for All Your Toys

The Grand UK Debut

JULY 17 - 19, 2024 Head to the British countryside to test and evaluate the top luxury and performance vehicles of 2024.

Give the Gift of Luxury

Latest Galleries in Marine

‘Orenda’ Superyacht in Photos

Ulyssia in Photos

More from our brands, shiseido, max mara to ink fragrance license, lebron james returning to lakers on 2-year deal with player option, rise of far-right populism in france threatens culture across europe, while u.k. potentially sets opposite course, artist joel mesler takes over new york with midtown pool party and an upper east side gallery show, the best yoga mats for any practice, according to instructors.

The 50 Most Disappointing Movie Sequels of All Time

By Andy Greene

Andy Greene

Sequels are almost as old as Hollywood itself. Even before talkies hit the marketplace in 1927, studios were churning out follow-up movies like The Fall of a Nation and Don Q, Son of Zorro. The trend continued throughout the Golden Age of Hollywood with The Bride of Frankenstein , Dracula’s Daughter , The Thin Man Goes Home, Mr. Belvedere Rings the Bell, Jolson Sings Again , and Father’s Little Dividend. Blockbusters of the Seventies and Eighties like Star Wars, The Exorcist, Halloween, Ghostbusters, Batman , and Raiders of the Lost Ark launched film franchises that continue to this day.

It’s easy to understand why risk-averse studios are so eager to green-light sequels. If a formula worked once before, why not simply try again? It’s also much easier to market a familiar story than it is to introduce something new. The only problem is that precious few sequels in Hollywood history have ever lived up to the original. And for every Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back and Terminator 2: Judgment Day that truly justify their existence, there are about 300 movies like Weekend at Bernie’s II and Son of the Mask that, to put it kindly, do not.  

A list of the worst sequels in history could be almost endless, and almost too easy. Few people turned on Crocodile Dundee in Los Angeles or American Pie Presents: The Naked Mile and expected some great masterpiece. So in picking our list of the worst movie sequels, we limited selections to movies that seemed at the time like they might actually be worthwhile. We admit this list is very subjective. And it’s easy to fault us for imagining anything decent could come out of the latter-day Die Hard or Terminator movies, but they somehow managed to get our hopes up at least a little every single time. (If they made Terminator 37, we’d still walk in feeling hopeful. We’re fools.)

Please join us on this sad journey through Hollywood history where Michael Meyers is never truly dead, John McClane transforms from a regular police officer into an immortal killing machine, the odd numbered Star Trek movies always suck, and we wait in vain for the day any Jurassic Park sequel is even halfway watchable. 

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines had a lot working against it before the cameras even started rolling. The first two Terminator movies were the brainchild of James Cameron. He wrote them, directed them, and oversaw every detail of their production. He’s also a genius that’s basically never made a bad movie. But Cameron wasn’t involved with Terminator 3. The film also didn’t have Linda Hamilton or Edward Furlong on board to play Sarah and John Connor. The only thing it had from the first two movies (besides a cameo from Earl Boen as Dr. Peter Silberman) was the Terminator himself, Arnold Schwarzenegger. And as we’ve learned from Batman and Robin, End of Days, The Sixth Day, and many other turkeys, Schwarzenegger alone doesn’t guarantee a great movie. And this is far from a great movie. It’s a reprise of T2, where yet another advanced Terminator comes back in time, played by Kristanna Loken, and John Connor (now Nick Stahl) has to find a way to stay alive with help from another T-850 Terminator, played by Schwarzenegger. There’s almost no scene worth remembering up until the very end when a nuclear war begins and John Connor fulfills his fate by taking command. It’s a genuinely chilling moment, but it can’t make up for the nearly two hours that precede it. To be fair, nothing was ever going to top T2. It’s one of the greatest sequels in Hollywood history, rivaled only by The Godfather II, but Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines doesn’t even come close.

Staying Alive (1983)

The dance sequences in 1977’s Saturday Night Fever are some of the most iconic images in the history of film. But they’re just a few fleeting minutes in an otherwise dark movie about a Brooklyn teenager (played by John Travolta) desperate to improve his lot in life. Gene Siskel considered it the greatest movie in the history of Hollywood. By the time we catch up with Travolta’s Tony Manero character in 1983’s Staying Alive, he’s a waiter who dreams of Broadway stardom. Sylvester Stallone is the director, and he invited his brother Frank to contribute songs to the soundtrack. And with all due respect to Frank Stallone, his work doesn’t exactly stand up to the Bee Gees. (They have some deeply unmemorable songs of their own on the soundtrack.) But bad music is far from the biggest problem in Staying Alive. There’s simply no heart to the story, and Manero finds himself acting in an abysmal Broadway musical that feels like a Flock of Seagulls fever dream. “ Staying Alive is a sequel with no understanding of what made its predecessor work,” Janet Maslin wrote in The New York Times. “The first film was funny and touching, powered by a phenomenally successful score. This one is clumsy, mean-spirited, and amazingly unmusical.”

Jurassic Park: The Lost World (1997)

With the very big exception of the Indiana Jones movies, Steven Spielberg has largely resisted the lure of sequels throughout his long career. He could have made a fortune directing follow-up movies to Jaws, E.T., and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, but he knew they’d never live up to the originals, and that his time would be better spent on new projects. But 1993’s Jurassic Park was such a mega-hit that he went against his better judgment and agreed to direct 1997’s The Lost World: Jurassic Park. It’s an adaptation of a novel that Michael Crichton reluctantly churned out in 1995 so that this very movie could exist. It’s about another island where the Jurassic Park dinosaurs were bred. Jeff Goldblum heads there alongside Julianne Moore and Vince Vaughn. The dinos attack. People die. In the end, a T. rex is set loose in San Diego. It all feels very humdrum and lacks any sense of wonder found in the original. It made a ton of money, and they’re in the midst of creating a seventh Jurassic Park right now, but only the first one is a genuinely good movie. The sequels are all varying degrees of terrible. 

Bad Santa 2 (2016)

When comedy sequels truly work, which is exceedingly rare, they come out within a couple of years of the original, and are assembled by the same creative team. Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey and Addams Family Values are the gold standard here. They hit theaters within two years of their predecessors, and the key behind-the-scenes players (Chris Matheson and Ed Solomon for Bill & Ted, Barry Sonnenfeld for Addams Family ) were back. Bad Santa 2 came out 13 years after Bad Santa, without the help of original director Terry Zwigoff or writers Glenn Ficarra and John Requa. They did have Bad Santa himself, Billy Bob Thortnon, along with Tony Cox as his conniving partner, and even former child actor Brett Kelly reprising his Santa-obsessed Thurman Merman character. The old gang reunites to pull off another Christmas heist, but the dirty jokes just don’t land in this one. “There’s a going-through-the-motions vibe to the whole affair,” wrote Rolling Stone’ s David Fear. “The original believed in its sodden, everyone-sucks with every ounce of its hardened, pitch-black heart — ironically, its horribleness made it that much more humanistic (and hilarious). The sequel is closer to fool’s coal: You can blow the thin patina of painted darkness off it with a breeze and find there’s nothing underneath.”

Teen Wolf Too (1987)

To be very clear, the original Teen Wolf is far from a great movie. But Michael J. Fox had more than enough Back to the Future -era charm to pull off the role as a nerd turned werewolf who becomes a high school basketball star and unlikely ladies man. Sadly, Fox is nowhere to be seen in the sequel. It stars Jason Bateman as the cousin of his character. He goes to college, discovers he’s also a werewolf, and uses his powers to win boxing matches. “College Boxer Transforms Into Werewolf” should have generated headlines all across the globe, but it’s treated as little more than a regional curiosity in this horrid movie. “The pacing is near-cataleptic and the movie’s intended comic highlight is a frog fight in the biology lab,” wrote Michael Wilmington in the Los Angeles Times. “Isn’t that just what you’re dying to see and hear? Bad dialogue, lugubriously paced; awful jokes about werewolves, and guffawing actors churlishly hurling around a lot of little frogs?”

Men in Black: International (2019)

If any movie franchise was poised to create a cinematic universe, it was Men in Black. There’s literally an entire galaxy of wacky aliens to explore, and a small army of Men in Black spread across Earth to battle them. If Sony handled this IP properly, we could be 10 seasons into a Men in Black cable show, eight seasons into an animated program, and somewhere around spinoff movie 12 or 13. But their first attempt to move beyond the Will Smith/Tommy Lee Jones movie trilogy was 2019’s Men in Black: International, starring Chris Hemsworth, Tessa Thompson, Rebecca Ferguson, Liam Neeson, and Kumail Nanjiani. It centers around a London Men in Black office, and the search for a powerful weapon hidden somewhere on the planet. It grossed just enough to possibly break even, but not nearly enough to justify another one of these things. ”It has been 17 years since Men in Black was a hot property, and the intervening gap has done nothing to revive interest in it,” wrote film critic James Berardinelli. “Whoever spearheaded this half-hearted resurrection should be fitted with a golden parachute. For those who remember the Men in Black movies fondly, stick with your memories. Seeing this latest installment is more likely to degrade than enhance them.”

Airplane 2: The Sequel (1982)

When it comes to comedy sequels, the temptation to simply recreate the exact structure of the original movie, along with all of the signature gags, is just too tough for most filmmakers to ignore. That’s why the genius trio of David Zucker, Jim Abrahams, and Jerry Zucker opted against creating a sequel to Airplane! so they could devote their time to developing the TV series Police Squad. That show — which eventually morphed into the Naked Gun movie franchise — is also why Leslie Nielsen wasn’t free to appear in Airplane 2: The Sequel. It did reunite Robert Hays, Julie Hagerty, and Lloyd Bridges, but writer-director Ken Finkleman simply doesn’t have the same comedic instincts as Zucker-Abrahams-Zucker. (His prior movie was Grease 2. Need we say more?) He wrote a screenplay about a lunar shuttle headed to the moon, but it’s basically just a straight remake of Airplane! minus about 500 laughs. The only good thing about the whole fiasco is that Naked Gun exists because Zucker-Abrahams-Zucker were smart enough to avoid this movie. You won’t see either of the Naked Gun sequels on this list. Unlike Airplane 2: The Sequel, they’re both extremely funny.

Lethal Weapon 4 (1998)

If we were making a list of the best sequels in Hollywood history, Lethal Weapon 2 would be near the top of the list. The third one was slightly underwhelming, but the series didn’t crap out until the fourth one arrived in 1998. By this point, Joe Pesci and Rene Russo were part of the Lethal Weapon family along with series stars Mel Gibson and Danny Glover. Chris Rock and Jet Li came on board for the fourth chapter, cramming in so many big names they barely fit on the poster. In this one, Riggs and Murtaugh battle an Asian counterfeiter/slave trader. Glover is beyond “too old for this shit” by this one, considering that his character planned on retiring from the police force a decade earlier, and it feels like everyone is just going through the motions, and counting how much money they’re making per second. The script was nowhere near ready when filming started, and that’s clear in most every frame. “I felt like Lethal Weapon 4 was outtakes [from the previous movies],” wrote critic Roger Ebert, “stuff they didn’t use earlier, pieced together into a movie that doesn’t really, in its heart, believe it is necessary.”

Iron Man 2 (2010)

The first Iron Man movie forever changed Hollywood. It marked the beginning of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the start of a broader superhero fixation that grips the industry to this day, and a new dawn for the career of Robert Downey Jr. But when it came time to make a second Iron Man movie in 2010, just two years after the original, Marvel was still fine-tuning its movie operation. Justin Theroux took over as screenwriter for this one, and he cobbled together a convoluted tale where Tony Stark is forced to confront a serious health scare, a powerful new Russian enemy portrayed by Mickey Rourke, and pressures that came after the public learned of his true identity. “Everything fun and terrific about Iron Man, a mere two years ago, has vanished with its sequel,” wrote the Hollywood Reporter’ s Kirk Honeycutt. “In its place, Iron Man 2 has substituted noise, confusion, multiple villains, irrelevant stunts, and misguided story lines. A film series that started out with critical and commercial success will have to settle for only the latter with this sequel.” 

Thor: Love and Thunder (2022)

The initial announcement that Natalie Portman was returning to the Marvel Cinematic Universe for 2022’s Thor: Love and Thunder was greeted with real excitement. She’d been AWOL since 2013’s Thor: The Dark World, despite playing a pretty big role in the saga as Jane Foster, Thor’s astrophysicist girlfriend. Excitement grew when fans learned she was going to finally wield the hammer herself and take on the role of the Mighty Thor. But then word slipped out that the character was battling stage 4 cancer. The script tries to balance out this colossal bummer with an endless series of comic sequences that creates a very odd overall tone. If you don’t believe us, listen to Thor himself, Chris Hemworth: “I got caught up in the improv and the wackiness, and I became a parody of myself,” he told Vanity Fair this year. “I didn’t stick the landing.”

Alien Resurrection (1997)

The first three Alien movies were directed by three of the best directors of their time: Ridley Scott, James Cameron, and David Fincher. The third one was a letdown, since Fincher was still a novice, the studio didn’t fully trust him, and the screenplay was never really finished. But it remains a David Fincher movie that’s intermittently innovative and interesting. The same can’t be said for 1997’s Alien Resurrection. It takes place on a military spaceship 200 years after Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley character died at the end of Alien 3. She’s cloned from a drop of her blood, and somehow her memories are intact. They also bring back the Xenomorph alien species, which is a very, very bad idea. (Haven’t these people heard about the events of the first three movies?) Needless to say, the Xenomorphs grow, reproduce, and start killing. Winona Ryder enters the story, and we eventually learn she’s a robot. Ripley once again batters the shit out of the Xenomorph, but haven’t we seen this all before? “This is a series whose inspiration has come, gone, and been forgotten,” wrote Roger Ebert. “I’m aliened out.”

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)

For a while, it was popular to cite Spider-Man 3 as the low point of the franchise. But time has been somewhat kind to Emo Spider-Man and his Pete Wentz haircut, and a small cult (as well as endless memes) have grown around its weirdness. And even if you think Spider-Man 3 is a bloated sludge of a movie with too many villains, it’s clearly superior to The Amazing Spider-Man 2, which marked the premature end of the Andrew Garfield era. It’s the one where Jamie Foxx plays Electro, Paul Giamatti takes on the Rhino role, the Green Goblin returns, and Gwen (played by Emma Stone) falls to her death. This was the fifth Spider-Man movie in a 12-year period, and it all just feels like a rehash of things we’ve seen before, along with an effort to set up about six different spinoff movies and sequels. “The studios and the producers have to split the difference — between excellence and adequacy, between darkness and light, between seriousness and fun,” Wesley Morris wrote on Grantland. “ The Amazing Spider-Man 2 might have been split too far. It doesn’t taste like anything.” 

U.S. Marshals (1998)

The huge success of 1993’s The Fugitive meant a sequel was somewhat inevitable, even though any such project was basically doomed from the start. There was no logical way for Harrison Ford to be framed for a second murder, escape from the law, and get chased around again by Tommy Lee Jones. It would have been preposterous, and Ford was never going to sign on to such a thing. The only move was to send Jones’ Samuel Gerard character and his team of U.S. Marshals after another unjustly accused man. That’s what happened in 1998’s U.S. Marshals, where Wesley Snipes takes over for Harrison Ford as the man on the run. The movie was a modest hit, but it has aged terribly. Jones himself isn’t even willing to defend it these days. “The thing that drove The Fugitive was that we weren’t chasing just a normal doctor,” he told Rolling Stone in our 2023 oral history of The Fugitive. “Whatever we were doing, we were chasing Harrison Ford, and I think he was the engine of the movie. With U.S. Marshals, we had a different director, had a different approach, and it just wasn’t … the movie wasn’t as good as The Fugitive. ” It’s impossible to argue with that. 

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)

The Star Trek film franchise got off to an extremely shaky start with the snoozefest that is 1979’s Star Trek: The Motion Picture, which just made 1982’s Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan all the more stunning. Star Trek III: The Search For Spock was a minor letdown in 1984, but words can barely describe our love for 1986’s Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. That’s the bonkers time-travel one with the whales that’s as fun to watch the 200th time as the first. Leonard Nimoy was given the chance to direct that one, which is why William Shatner demanded the director’s chair for Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. It’s about the search for God at the center of the universe and an evil Vulcan named Sybok, but it barely matters. Nothing about the movie works, especially the cringe scene of Spock, Kirk, and Bones singing “Row, Row, Row Your Boat” around a campfire. It was such a fiasco that 1991’s Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country was designed as a farewell to the OG cast. 

Caddyshack 2 (1988)

Imagine a version of Caddyshack without Bill Murray, Rodney Dangerfield, Lacey Underdall, a single quotable line or even a single laugh. Whatever comes to mind is surely nowhere near as horrid as Caddyshack 2. Chevy Chase is the only returning cast member, and he’s joined by Robert Stack, Randy Quaid, Dyan Cannon, Chyna Phillips, and Dan Aykroyd in the thankless Bill Murray role as the groundskeeper. That’s a good cast, but they can’t save this terrible movie about a millionaire buying the country club and turning it into an amusement park. Original Caddyshack director Harold Ramis is credited as a co-writer, but he denounced the movie in later years and said he nearly had his name removed. The ultimate red flag here is that Dangerfield deemed this movie beneath his standards. This is a man (albeit a comic genius) that took parts in Meet Wally Sparks, My 5 Wives, and The 4th Tenor. He was willing to accept almost any role that put him on the big screen, but not Caddyshack 2. It was the right move. Nothing could have saved Caddyshack 2, not even Rodney. 

Halloween Kills (2021)

The original Halloween, in 1978, is a horror classic that paved the way for A Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, and many other slasher films of the Eighties. But much like the franchises it spawned, Halloween begat sequel after sequel that fell flat in profound ways. A miracle happened in 2018 when Jamie Lee Curtis returned to the fold for Halloween, which ignored every film after the first one, and managed to create genuine chills by showing a grizzled, gray-haired Laurie Strode battling Michael Meyers yet again. They should have left it there. The 2021 sequel isolates Strode in a hospital room for much of the movie while Meyers wanders through the town of Haddonfield on yet another killing spree. Familiar faces from the original movie show up, including Kyle Richards from The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, who acted in the first movie as a child. But the whole thing feels like a tired, pointless rerun. It was also designed to set up a third and final movie, 2022’s Halloween Ends, but they should have learned the lesson of the first movie. You can’t just keep redoing these things over and over. More important, a movie should stand on its own. It shouldn’t feel like connective tissue between two others.

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023)

Future film historians will have real fun trying to pinpoint the exact moment the Marvel Cinematic Universe jumped the shark. Some will point to Eternals in 2021, Thor: Love and Thunder in 2022, or Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness that same year. But it’s a safe bet that 2023’s Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania will be mentioned many times. Marvel was pounding out content at a furious clip when the movie went into production, and resources were spread way too thin across numerous TV shows and movies. Postproduction was rushed on this third Ant-Man movie, and the special-effects team was focused on wrapping up Black Panther: Wakanda Forever. The result was a movie that literally didn’t look finished when it hit theaters. When you throw in a confusing, tired plot about Ant-Man and his family accidentally entering the “Quantum Realm” (ask your 11-year-old nephew what that means), you’ve got a real mess on your hands. “Everyone just kind of wanders through this movie — through its elaborate, colorful, cluttered, psychedelic-album-cover-style environments,” wrote New York critic Bilge Ebiri. “They occasionally crack jokes or cross their arms. Nothing seems to match. If you told me that the actors had been shot before the filmmakers decided what they would be looking at or interacting with, I’d believe you.”

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1 (2014)

The Harry Potter franchise set a very bad precedent when the final book in the series was turned into two movies. This was justifiable in the Potter case, since that’s a 607-page book that would have been tough to boil down to one satisfying movie. But it made no narrative sense whatsoever to take the 390-page Mockingjay, the final Hunger Games novel, and stretch it into two movies. The first one clocks in at an agonizing 123 minutes, where very little happens of any real importance. Katniss and her buddies enter an underground district and prepare for a grand revolution, but it’s all just a setup for the second chapter. (There’s also the problem that this is a Hunger Games movie where we don’t get the payoff of an actual Hunger Games.) The movie was a hit and critics were once again impressed by the performance of Jennifer Lawrence, but even director Francis Lawrence says it was wrong to make two movies out of one book. “What I realized in retrospect — and after hearing all the reactions and feeling the kind of wrath of fans, critics, and people at the split — is that I realized it was frustrating,” he told People in 2023. “And I can understand it.… I totally regret [splitting the movies]. I totally do. I’m not sure everybody does, but I definitely do.”

The Godfather Part III (1990)

It would be deeply unfair to put the third Godfather movie on a list of the 50 worst sequels in Hollywood history. It’s a much better film than its reputation suggests, and placing it alongside Alien vs. Predator or Weekend at Bernie’s 2 would be cruel. It also has perhaps the most quoted line (“Just when I thought I was out … they pull me back in”) in any Godfather movie. But this is a list of disappointing sequels, and expectations for this movie were just off the charts. The Godfather is arguably the greatest movie in history. The Godfather II is inarguably the greatest sequel in history. There was no way a third film that came 16 years after the second one would do anything but disappoint. The fact that Robert Duvall backed out over a salary dispute, and Winona Ryder quit shortly before filming, causing director Francis Ford Coppola to give his teenager daughter Sophia a key role, didn’t help matters much. The movie still reunited Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, and Talie Shire with director Coppola, and grossed $137 million, but to call it anything short of a disappointment would be wrong.

Jaws 2 (1978)

Jaws 2 has one of the greatest taglines in history: “Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water …” That’s just about the only memorable thing about the movie, which is about another killer shark descending on Amity Island that Roy Scheider is forced to battle. This time around, it nearly kills his son before he electrocutes it and once again saves the town. (Does work like this really fall under the jurisdiction of the police chief?) Steven Spielberg was too busy working on Close Encounters of the Third Kind to direct it, but he also had little desire to head back into the water after all the difficulties he faced making the first one. He also knew that topping it would be impossible. To be very clear, the third and fourth Jaws movies were significantly worse. Jaws 2 fails in rather pedestrian ways. Jaws 3-D and Jaws: The Revenge fail in spectacularly inept (and often hysterical) ways. But nobody walked into either of those movies thinking they were seeing any sort of masterpiece. People had high hopes for Jaws 2, and they left deeply disappointed. 

Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 (2000)

The 1999 film calendar was crammed with so many remarkable movies that many critics are now calling it one of the single greatest years in Hollywood history. And even in the middle of all of that brilliance, The Blair Witch Project stood out. The “found footage” horror movie was shot on a microbudget of just $60,000, but still managed to scare the living shit out of everyone who saw it. A sequel was inevitable. Sadly, it completely disregarded the DIY feel of the original, along with anything that felt even remotely original despite being directed by Paradise Lost creator Joe Berlinger. We instead get a very traditional horror flick about a group of Blair Witch Project fans who head to the site of the first movie, Burkittsville, Maryland, and find themselves battling an evil force. “ Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 is a not a very lucid piece of filmmaking (and contains no Book of Shadows ),” wrote Roger Ebert. “I suppose it seems clear enough to Berlinger, who co-wrote it and helped edit it, but one viewing is not enough to make the material clear, and the material is not intriguing enough, alas, to inspire a second viewing.”

Live Free or Die Hard (2007)

Die Hard: With a Vengeance is one of the greatest threequels in the history of action movies, largely because they brought back original Die Hard director John McTiernan after leaving him out of the underwhelming second movie. A fourth movie didn’t materialize for another 12 years. This time around, Underworld director Les Wiseman was at the helm. He was working with a ridiculous script where John McClane battles a cyberterrorist in Washington, D.C. Bruce Willis practically has superpowers in it. At one moment, he destroys a flying helicopter by driving a car into it. It’s so ridiculous that even Michael Scott on The Office couldn’t enjoy it. “Here’s the thing about Die Hard 4, ” he said in one episode. “ Die Hard 1, the original, John McClain is just this normal guy, you know? He’s just a normal New York City cop who gets his feet cut, he gets beat up. But he’s an everyday guy. In Die Hard 4, he is jumping a motorcycle into a helicopter in the air. You know? He’s invincible. It’s just sort of lost from Die Hard 1. It’s not Terminator. ” For once, Michael Scott is completely right. 

Major League II (1994)

Creating a sequel to Major League wasn’t a crazy idea. We never even saw the misfit group of Cleveland Indians play in the World Series in the original movie, which remains one of the best sports films in history. And Major League II did manage to reunite the original cast, with the sole exception of Wesley Snipes, who was replaced by Omar Epps. The crazy idea of Major League II was downgrading the R rating from the original all the way to PG. It neutered the characters in every way possible. Who wants a Ricky “Wild Thing” Vaughn who can’t swear? You want to hear “locker-room talk” in the locker room. The movie also felt like a bland rehash of the original. “There has rarely been such a steep and strange decline between a movie and its sequel as the one between the fast, silly original and the dismal, boring Major League II, ” Caryn James wrote in The New York Times. “While the first film ran riot with baseball cliches, this one plods along and almost takes them seriously.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017)

In 2003, Disney somehow turned its Mad Men -era Pirates of the Caribbean theme-park attraction into a Johnny Depp movie that grossed more than $650 million. The first two sequels racked up an astonishing $1 billion each, and earned surprisingly respectable reviews, considering the source material. But director Gore Verbinski stepped aside for the fourth movie in favor of Rob Marshall, though it’s slightly unfair to blame him for the bloated, painfully unfunny mess that is Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales. The franchise simply ran out of gas at this point, and no amount of special-effects wizardry was going to change that. “Its pleasures are so meager, its delight in its own inventions so forced and false, that it becomes almost the perfect opposite of entertainment,” wrote A.O. Scott in The New York Times. “To insist otherwise is a variation on the sunk-cost fallacy. Since you exchanged money for fun, fun is surely what you must have purchased, and you may cling to that idea in the face of contrary evidence. But trust me on this: This movie would be a rip-off even if someone paid you to see it.”

More American Graffiti (1979)

The original American Graffiti, in 1973, was such a colossal pop-culture force that it somehow gave the world Happy Days, Star Wars, and the entire concept of rock & roll oldies. (We’re only slightly exaggerating here.) The George Lucas film took place during one very long night in 1962, but the 1979 sequel, written and directed by Bill Norton, is spread across four New Year’s Eves between 1964 and 1967. Nearly the entire cast, except Richard Dreyfuss, returned from the original (there’s even a Harrison Ford cameo), but the story leaps erratically back and forth through time, sometimes using split screens, and it’s very hard to follow. It also simply lacks the fun and innocence of the first one. Unsurprisingly, it was also a huge box-office bomb that marked the end of Ron Howard’s acting career.

Coming 2 America (2021)

Eddie Murphy spent decades resisting calls to make a sequel to 1988’s Coming to America before finally surrendering in 2021. It was a mistake. The movie is so desperate to evoke nostalgia by bringing back characters, set pieces, and sight gags from the original that it fails to tell a compelling story of its own. Yes, there’s a thin plot about Murphy coming back to Queens, New York, in search of his lost son, but it’s just an excuse for Murphy to lather on latex and makeup to play the old men in the barber shop that are somehow still alive. The scenes back in the fake African nation of Zamunda are even less effective. It’s briefly fun to see Murphy, Arsenio Hall, and the old gang back together, but how many of you watched it even a single time after the first viewing? Be honest. 

Wonder Woman: 1984 (2020)

The problem with Wonder Woman: 1984 isn’t the cast or even the director. Patty Jenkins, Gal Gadot, Chris Prine, Kristen Wiig, Pedro Pascal, and Robin Wright are all capable of remarkable work. And the first Wonder Woman movie in 2017 is one of the great superhero movies of the past decade. And the problem isn’t even the decision to move the action from World War I to the Reagan decade. That was clever since it opened up so many creative possibilities for the narrative. The problem is the script, which finds Wonder Woman working at the Smithsonian, where she comes across an ancient artifact that grants wishes. This causes her co-worker to transform herself into an evil cheetah, and grants a twisted businessman immense power. This is all much cheesier than it even sounds. The movie hit near the peak of Covid, and most people saw it on Max instead of the big screen. The reaction was not kind, to put it mildly. “Three years ago, Wonder Woman emerged amid a reckoning on male abuse and power; the timing was coincidental, but it also made the character feel meaningful,” Manohla Dargis wrote in The New York Times. “In 2017, when Wonder Woman was done saving the world, her horizons seemed limitless. I didn’t expect that her next big adult battle would be at the mall.”

Zoolander 2 (2016)

The temptation for Ben Stiller to film a Zoolander sequel must have been intense. The 2001 fashion-industry spoof wasn’t a huge commercial or critical hit, but that was largely because it had the misfortune of landing in theaters just weeks after 9/11. We weren’t exactly in a laughing mood at the time. A giant cult of Zoolander fans emerged in the years that followed, but what they really just wanted to do was watch it over and over, sprinkle quotes into everyday conversation, and attend the occasional midnight screening. They didn’t want a second one packed with more celebrity cameos than actual jokes, and endless callbacks to the original. “There are some clever bits, and the satire is at times scathing,” wrote film critic James Berardinelli, “but, on the whole, moments of hilarity are like oases in a desert of tedium.” 

Star Trek: Insurrection (1998)

After years of shoddy odd-numbered Star Trek films, fans hoped for a new pattern once the Next Generation crew took over in the mid-Nineties. Their hopes were raised with the release of 1996’s Star Trek: First Contact, which is one of the greatest science-fiction movies of the Nineties. But then came the crushing disappointment of 1998’s Star Trek: Insurrection . Captain Picard and the gang were back together, and Jonathan Frakes was once again directing, but the movie was an enormous step backward. The story centers around the Federation’s attempt to displace the population of a peaceful planet that had discovered a way to live forever. This would have been an interesting two-part episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, but it simply didn’t feel like a movie. “ Insurrection is a muddled, gimpy mess, filled with the worst sort of Trek clichés and ill-timed humorous outbursts,” Marc Salvov wrote in The Austin Chronicle . “On top of that, the film might as well have been edited by Mr. Scott in the midst of a Romulan-ale bender: Plot points appear out of nowhere, and voluminous backstory seems to have been dropped in favor of bigger, better explosions and forehead-slappingly bad double entendres. Is this Star Trek or Friends in Space ?”

City Slickers 2: The Legend of Curly’s Gold (1994)

Babaloo Mandel and Lowell Ganz are a brilliant writing duo that gave the world A League of Their Own, Parenthood, Splash, Spies Like Us, and Mr. Saturday Night . “We’ve done one sequel in our entire career,” Ganz told Rolling Stone in 2022. “That’s City Slickers . And the reason we don’t do more is we put our characters where we want them to be.” Mandel framed the issue in a more concise way: “The story is over. It’s done.” The story of City Slickers was definitely over after the events of the first movie, but it was such a giant hit that they were coaxed into writing a sequel. It finds Billy Crystal and Daniel Stern back on horses in the West on a mission to find lost gold. (Bruno Kirby had the good sense to avoid this one. He was essentially replaced by Jon Lovitz.) And even though Jack Palance’s Curly character dies in the original City Slickers, he returns in this one as Curly’s brother Duke. “What I missed was the rich humor and the human comedy of the original film — where the people, not the plot, were what mattered,” Roger Eberot wrote. “By the end of the film, with Slickers II also borrowing from the Indiana Jones movies, I was overcome with deja vu and indifference.”

Blues Brothers 2000 (1998)

There are a lot of problems with Blues Brothers 2000, starting with the fact that John Belushi died 16 years before it came out. That’s an insurmountable issue that should have ended any talk of a sequel. But Dan Aykroyd’s never come across a franchise he isn’t willing to drive into the ground. And if he was willing to participate in My Girl 2, five Ghostbusters (and counting) movies, and even (shudder) Caddyshack 2, he was certainly down to try and revive The Blues Brothers in 1998 with help from John Goodman, Joe Morton, and child actor J. Evan Bonifant. They were joined by a truly impressive lineup of musical icons, including Aretha Franklin, James Brown, Wilson Pickett, Bo Diddley, Isaac Hayes, Eric Clapton, Dr. John, and many, many others. It could be the greatest assemblage of musical talent ever to appear on film. But it’s not enough to make Blues Brothers 2000 a watchable movie. It’s about Elwood Blues getting out of prison and putting the band back together, but it just feels sad and pointless without Jake by his side. 

Independence Day: Resurgence (2016)

Independence Day was the highest grossing movie of 1996, raking in more than $800 million. It was also an incredibly fun popcorn movie as long as you don’t spend too much time thinking about the fact mankind foiled an alien invasion by uploading a virus to their ship’s mainframe from a rinky-dink Windows 95-era laptop. (The aliens mastered interstellar travel, but they didn’t have even rudimentary virus protection? How did these computer systems even line up in the first place?) Rumors of a sequel swirled for years, but Will Smith wanted such a colossal payday they eventually moved forward without him for 2011’s Independence Day: Resurgence . They did manage to bring back Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman, Judd Hirsch, Brent Spiner, and Vivica A. Fox, but what they didn’t have was an original idea. The aliens return. The world unites against them. Pullman gives another inspiring speech through a bullhorn. Yawn. If this movie hit in 1999 or so, it would have likely been a huge hit. But we had to wait 15 years for this thing. By that point, the Marvel Cinematic Universe was in full swing. It made this limp Independence Day retread feel very tired and just wildly unnecessary. 

Cars 2 (2011)

The original Cars is basically Doc Hollywood in a bizarre, post-human world where cars are talking, autonomous beings. They should have ripped off another great movie for the sequel, which sends Lightning McQueen and his team to Europe to compete in the World Grand Prix. Along the way, they get entangled with some British spies. The whole thing reeks like a quickie cash-grab designed to sell toy cars. It’s one of the few Pixar movies to have a “rotten” rating on Rotten Tomatoes. “Will your kids have fun?” Logan Hill asked in his Vulture review. “Sure, though the green-energy subplot is too intricate. As for the parents, politically, it feels like a focus-grouped cop-out. Lefties will be flattered by the cars’ environmental ideals; conservatives will cheer when it turns out that green energy doesn’t work. Worry not, Disney shareholders: No automotive cross-branding opportunity was risked.” (The movie never explains what happened to the humans in the Cars universe. The cars clearly went Terminator and killed them all when they became self-aware, right?)

Terminator: Salvation (2009)

There’s something about The Terminator that keeps bringing people back into the theaters despite the plainly obvious fact that the series simply cannot work without James Cameron. And as much as Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines disappointed the Terminator faithful, it at least had Arnold Schwarzenegger and a powerful ending that gave the series somewhere to build toward. The nuclear holocaust was here, and now John Connor had to lead the resistance. That’s a premise for a pretty great movie. But 2009’s Terminator: Salvation was nothing even remotely great, despite casting Christian Bale as the newest John Connor. Arnold was busy serving as the governor of California at the time, and there’s not a single actor in it from the previous movies. It’s about the early days of Connor’s leadership during the war against Skynet. Lots of things blow up. There are chases. It’s all just an endless green screen of blah. An infamous audio leak from the set revealed that Bale had a complete meltdown at one point and chewed out director McG and members of the crew when a take was interrupted. “Am I going to walk around and rip your fucking lights down, in the middle of a scene?” he roars. “Then why the fuck are you walking right through like this in the background. What the fuck is it with you? Give me a fucking answer!” This audio was 100 times more entertaining than any moment in Salvation . 

Superman 4 (1987)

It’s tempting to put Superman 3 on this list since it’s such an oddball outlier in the history of the franchise, but there’s a certain goofy charm to the movie. Throwing Richard Pryor into the world of Metropolis as a computer genius still makes us chuckle. But there’s nothing even remotely amusing about 1987’s Superman IV: The Quest for Peace . It’s a shockingly inept movie about Superman trying to rid the world of atomic weapons, and battling the foe Nuclear Man. The film was shot on a shoestring budget, and that’s clear in every single frame. It’s hard to believe the original film came out less than 10 years prior. “The script of Lawrence Konner and Mark Rosenthal contains neither bite nor gleam, and the movie has no propulsion,” wrote Michael Wilmington of the Los Angles Times . “By the end, the editing takes on a meat-ax fervor, as [one character] disappears mysteriously and the loose ends are given a violently perfunctory last-second wrap-up. The overall effect is of a story atomized and dying before our eyes, collapsing into smashed pulp, ground down into big-budget Kryptonite ash.” The film was such a disaster that it wasn’t until 2006 that another Superman movie hit theaters. It was a direct sequel to the original two Superman movies, and pretended like Superman 4 didn’t exist. Sadly for us, it does exist. 

Sex and the City 2 (2010)

The temptation in sequels is often to move the action to an exotic overseas location since it opens up all sorts of new storytelling possibilities. The Hangover 2 (Bangkok), Oceans 12 (Amsterdam, Paris, Rome), Cars 2 (France, Italy, England), The Karate Kid 2 (Okinawa), and National Lampoon’s European Vacation (Europe, duh) are just a few of the examples. And in the second Sex and the City movie, Carrie Bradshaw and her friends take an extended trip to Abu Dhabi, though they actually filmed it in Morocco. It’s part of an absurdly bloated two and a half hour movie where the four ladies deal with professional and personal dilemmas, discover the power of friendship for the 600th time, and wear designer outfits that must have collectively cost them about $18 million. The whole thing is so abysmal and boring that even hardore Sex and the City fans rarely defend it. It sent the series onto life support before it came back to Max as the 99.9 percent Kim Cattrall-free …And Just Like That in 2022. 

Space Jam: A New Legacy (2021)

Is Michael Jordan the GOAT in the NBA, or is it LeBron James? It’s a basketball debate that’s likely to rage for eternity. Both sides have very strong arguments to make in terms of total points scored or the number of championship rings they wear. When it comes to their Space Jam movies, however, it isn’t really a contest. Jordan made a very fun live-action/animated Warner Bros. movie back in 1996. And James delivered a turkey of a sequel in 2021, where the Lakers great and his fictional son Dominic find themselves trapped in the Warner Bros. Serververse. They come into contact with all sorts of studio IP, including Rick and Morty, The Wizard of Oz, Harry Potter, The Lord of the Rings, and King Kong, but the whole thing feels more like a Warner Bros. shareholders presentation than a movie. When it comes time for the big basketball game, it’s hard to even care. “It is a film that has no reason to exist,” wrote Alex Shepherd in The New Republic, “except as a vehicle for reminding people that various pieces of content, all of them merchandisable, are available for instant streaming now.”

Rocky V (1990)

The first four Rocky movies followed a familiar formula. A powerful opponent challenges Rocky Balboa to a boxing match, his devoted wife, Adrian, expresses some doubts (“You can’t win, Rocky!”), he furiously trains, and the film climaxes with the fight. In 1990’s Rocky V, however, the formula was completely upended. It begins with the Balboa family losing all of their money after Rocky is diagnosed with a brain disorder that makes it impossible for him to fight. They move back to Philadelphia, and Rocky trains a young fighter named Tommy Gunn. It ends with Rocky and Gunn briefly fighting in the street, but audiences were less than thrilled. The movie didn’t capture the heart of the original Rocky or the cheeseball joy of the sequels. “The dramatic moves are so obvious and shopworn,” wrote the Chicago Reader ’s Jonathan Rosenbaum, “that not even the star’s mournful basset-hound expressions can redeem them.” It would be another 16 years before Stallone was given the green light on another Rocky movie. That one ends with Balboa back in the ring even though Stallone was 60-years-old by that point. It’s also an infinitely better movie than Rocky V . 

Revenge of the Nerds 2: Nerds in Paradise (1987)

The insane success of Animal House inspired roughly 100 knockoff movies about wild college campuses. The best of the bunch, by far, is 1984’s Revenge of the Nerds . This one twists the formula by casting nerds as the heroes, and the cool frat boys as villains. It’s hysterical and infinitely rewatchable. (And, yes, there’s a heinous scene near the end where one of the nerds dresses up in a jock’s costume and fools his girlfriend into having sex with him.) The sequel was unable to bring Anthony Edwards back for anything more than a cameo (he made a little film called Top Gun the prior year), but the rest of the cast is back for a movie that takes them down to Florida for a frat convention where they once again battle evil jocks. But it’s rated PG-13, when the original was a very hard R. That means the jokes are much softer, and the laughs never come. The only positive thing we can say about it is the made-for-TV sequels are even worse. 

Batman and Robin (1997)

The Batman franchise was already in serious decline by the time 1997’s Batman and Robin came around. Michael Keaton handed over the Batsuit to Val Kilmer for 1995’s Batman Forever, and Tim Burton ceded his director’s chair to Joel Schumacher. The result was a less-than-stellar movie, especially when compared to the dark brilliance of Batman Returns, but Jim Carrey’s manic energy as the Riddler (along with great songs by U2 and Seal) prevented it from being a total train wreck. Nothing could have prepared us, however, for the horrors of Batman and Robin . George Clooney is the Dark Knight in this one, and he battles Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Freeze, and Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy. He’s joined by not only Chris O’Donnell as Robin, but Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl. It’s a clusterfuck of characters, plot incoherence, and cheeseball, pun-filled dialogue straight out of a McBain movie (“It’s ice to see you”; “Let’s kick some ice.”) Nearly every person involved with the movie condemned it in the years that followed, especially Clooney. “It’s a terrible screenplay,” he told Howard Stern in 2020. “I’m terrible in it. Joel Schumacher, who just passed away, directed it, and he’d say, ‘Yeah, it didn’t work.’ We all whiffed on that one.”

Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977)

It wasn’t until the Seventies that hit movies routinely generated sequels. That’s why we have The Godfather II, Jaws II, Rocky II, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, Beneath the Planet of the Apes, and many others. The astronomical success of The Exorcist in 1973 guaranteed a follow-up chapter. But Exorcist novelist William Peter Blatty and original movie director William Friedkin didn’t want to be involved in 1978’s Exorcist II: The Heretic since they were in the midst of a lawsuit with the studio over profits from the first one. The studio did manage to bring back Linda Blair and Max von Sydow, but that wasn’t nearly enough to salvage this low-budget trainwreck of a movie where poor Regan, now a teenager, deals with the aftermath of the demonic possession from the first movie. “There had to be a sequel,” wrote Vinceny Canby in The New York Times, “but did it have to be this desperate concoction, the main thrust of which is that the original exorcism wasn’t all it was cracked up to be?”

Terminator: Dark Fate (2019)

After the stunning ineptitude of 2009’s Terminator: Salvation, the franchise bounced back to “somewhat watchable” status with 2015’s Terminator Genisys . The critics disagree with us here, and it’s not like Genisys is a masterpiece, but at least it was a little fun. (It wasn’t nearly as enjoyable as the criminally underrated 2008-09 Fox series Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles .) And when news hit that Linda Hamilton was finally returning to play Sarah Connor in 2015’s The Terminator: Dark Fate, it was hard not to feel genuine excitement. James Cameron signed on as producer. Hope was in the air. Then we saw the actual movie. In the first few minutes, a de-aged Hamilton watches a teenage John Connor get killed by a Terminator shortly after the events of T2, basically nullifying the entire movie. We flash-forward several years, and Skynet is at its old tricks again. It has sent yet another robot back in time. A grizzled Connor has to protect people that will be pivotal in the future. They meet up with an elderly Arnold, who once again helps them survive. We’ve seen this many times before. Once the thrill of seeing Hamilton in her badass Sarah Connor mode wears off, this becomes just another rote action movie. There’s been talk of another Terminator reboot, but let’s hope it doesn’t happen. Haven’t we all suffered enough at this point? 

The Hangover 3 (2013)

The third Hangover ditches the premise of the first two movies where four buddies have a debauched night on the town, wake up without any memories of it, and try to retrace their steps to find someone they lost along the way. It was insane enough this happened a second time, but moving the action from Las Vegas to Bangkok in the sequel was clever and occasionally quite funny. In the third one, they head back to Sin City for an adventure that’s heavy on plot and action, but very light on actual laughs. It also gives Ken Jeong a much bigger role than he had in the first two, but a little bit of his psychotic Leslie Chow character goes a very long way. And bringing everything back to Vegas just reminded us of the superiority of the first movie. “The second didn’t have to be funny, and wasn’t, but at least existed somewhere in the general vicinity of that borderless country known as Comedy,” Rick Groen wrote in The Globe and Mail . “Part Three doesn’t, not even remotely, which makes it not just bad, but weirdly, fascinatingly bad. What exactly is this? Certainly a cash cow, definitely an exercise in cynicism, maybe even a cri de coeur from the self-hating principals. Whatever, a comedy it ain’t.”

A Good Day to Die Hard (2013)

Live Free or Die Hard is not a good movie by any standard. But it’s practically Raiders of the Lost Ark compared to the flaming pile of dog shit that is 2013’s A Good Day to Die Hard . There’s no pretext that John McClane is a regular human being in this one. He’s a superhero that couldn’t be killed by conventional or even unconventional weapons. The plot barely matters, but it revolves around an ill-fated trip to Russia where he teams up with his son, played by Jai Courtney, and fights all sorts of evil dudes. They visit Chernobyl, fire off about 10,000 rounds of ammo, and a helicopter flies into a building. Bruce Willis says, “ Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker!” and everyone laughs because it reminds them of better Die Hard movies. There was talk of a sixth Die Hard for years, but that’s impossible now that Willis is retired from acting. Tragically, the franchise ended with A Good Day to Die Hard . The best thing we can do now is pretend the last two Die Hard movies were just bad dreams McClane had in the final years of his life. 

Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997)

Keanu Reeves isn’t opposed to signing on for sequels. He’s made four Matrix movies, four John Wicks, and three Bill and Ted’s . But when the makers of Speed 2: Cruise Control came to him, he had some doubts. “It was just a situation in life where I got the script and I read the script and I was like, ‘Ugh,’” Reeves recalled to Jimmy Kimmel in 2015. “It was about a cruise ship, and I was thinking, ‘A bus, a cruise ship.… Speed, bus, but then a cruise ship is even slower than a bus, and I was like, ‘I love you guys, but I just can’t do it.’” They carried forward with Jason Patrick essentially in the Reeves role, but it was a mistake. Reeves was 100 percent right to realize that a speeding cruise ship simply isn’t very scary. The film was a critical fiasco that forever killed the franchise and was nominated for eight Golden Raspberry awards. This was a good lesson. If Keanu Reeves thinks your movie is dumb, don’t do it. He knows what he’s talking about. 

Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)

The initial expectations for Star Trek: Nemesis were very high. Fans were desperate to see the Next Generation cast after a four-year hiatus, and they were returning in an even-numbered movie. The ironclad rule up to that point was that the even-numbered Trek films were all great. Tragically, the streak ended with Star Trek: Nemesis in spectacular fashion. The enemy this time around is Shinzon, a young clone of Picard (played by Tom Hardy) that took over the Romulan empire. (Pay no attention to the fact that Hardy doesn’t look a damn thing like Patrick Stewart at any age.) At the climax of the movie, Data sacrifices himself to save Picard. That’s probably the only moment anyone that saw Nemesis in the theater can recall. The rest is a boring blur of cheesy special effects and dialogue that reads like it was written by ChatGPT. What went wrong? “The director was an idiot,” said Counselor Troi actress Marina Sirtis. “I guess that’s a fair assessment of someone that wasn’t willing to take advantage of the help he was offered.” The movie was such a bomb that TNG never appeared on the big screen again. Thankfully, they returned for the Paramount+ show Star Trek: Picard in 2020. In a clear acknowledgement that Nemesis was a complete turd, they gave Data another death scene. 

Dumb and Dumber To (2014)

Comedy sequels are notoriously hard to pull off. For every successful attempt like Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey or Addams Family Values, you have 50 fiascos like Police Academy 2: Their First Assignment or Meet the Fockers . We won’t list either of those films on this list since no reasonable person expected them to be any good. That’s not the case for Dumb and Dumber To, which reunited Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels with directors Peter and Bobby Farrell 20 years after the original Dumb and Dumber . The moronic duo of Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne travel cross country again in this one, but this time they’re searching for Dunne’s lost daughter. After the initial thrill of seeing Carey and Daniels back in character wears off, it becomes clear a Dumb and Dumber sequel is way better as an idea than an actual movie. It’s also so shockingly unfunny it almost makes you question the value of the first one. But don’t do that. The first one is one of the funniest movies of the Nineties. It’s Jim Carrey at his absolute peak. Dumb and Dumber To is a sad retread. 

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008)

It may be slightly hard to remember now, but there was enormous excitement surrounding Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull back in 2008. We’d waited through 19 very long Indy-free years at this point, and we finally had Harrison Ford back in his fedora with Steven Spielberg in the director’s chair. They even brought in Karen Allen to reprise her role as Marion Ravenwood from Raiders of the Lost Ark . They also brought in Shia LaBeouf as Indy’s greaser son, Mutt, Cate Blanchett as an evil Soviet, a muddled plot about KGB agents and extraterrestrial life, and sequences where Mutt swings from vines like Tarzan and Indy survives a nuclear blast in a refrigerator. It simply doesn’t cohere into a fun movie that can remotely compare to the first three. “Reckless daring is what’s missing from Crystal Skull, ” David Denby wrote in The New Yorker . “The movie leaves a faint aura of depression, because you don’t want to think of daring as the exclusive property of youth. There must be a way for middle-aged men to take chances and leap over chasms, but repeating themselves with less conviction isn’t it.”

Highlander II: The Quickening (1991)

If you were at least a somewhat dorky teenager in the Eighties or Nineties, you probably have fond memories of the first Highlander movie. It stars Christopher Lambert as an immortal being from the 16th-century Scottish Highlands who battles other immortals in mid-Eighties New York City. The 1991 sequel, Highlander II: The Quickening, roped Sean Connery back into the saga, and holy mother of God, it is an unholy mess. Not only does it completely violate established Highlander canon by transforming the immortals into aliens from another planet, it was filmed on the cheap in Argentina, and director Russell Mulcahy was removed from the postproduction process so the producers could totally butcher his original (admittedly flawed) vision. It often ranks very high on lists of the worst movies in history. “ Highlander II: The Quickening is the most hilariously incomprehensible movie I’ve seen in many a long day — a movie almost awesome in its badness,” wrote Roger Ebert. “Wherever science-fiction fans gather, in decades and generations to come, this film will be remembered in hushed tones as one of the immortal low points of the genre.”

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019)

Being a Star Wars fan means dealing with a lot of bitter disappointment. This is a franchise with 12 movies, of which only about four or five are universally loved. Star Wars Episode One: The Phantom Menace is often cited as the low point, but we’re not counting prequels on this list. (It’s also not quite as awful as the lore suggests. Watch it again with an open mind.) But the biggest disappointment in Star Wars history came in 2019 with the release of Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker . After 42 years and 50 bazillion hours of fevered fan speculation, the world was finally seeing the (supposed) conclusion of the Skywalker saga. This was going to be the one that resolved all of the lingering issues, gave our heroes one last adventure, and ended the franchise on a perfectly satisfying note. Things got off to a bad start in the opening crawl when we learned Emperor Palpatine was back in the picture, which is something they never bothered to explain beyond Poe’s infamous “somehow Palpatine returned” line midway through the film. And after the prior film told us that Rey came from a humble background, meaning anyone could rise from obscurity and become a Jedi, we learn she’s actually a Palpatine. It was one of many ways that returning director J.J. Abrams tried to nullify Rian Johnson’s work on The Last Jedi . We spend time with Luke Skywalker as a force ghost, Han Solo as some other sort of apparition, Princess Leah via clumsily edited archival footage, Chewie, R2D2, C-3PO, and even Lando Calrissian, but nothing feels satisfying about any of it. It just feels like a bunch of random Star Wars images and characters thrown into a blender. It still earned more than $1 billion, but the reaction was so abysmal that Disney radically switched course and put all of its Star Wars energy into TV shows. We’re heard endless reports and rumors about additional movies, but none of them have actually gone into production. Something has to happen eventually. The Star Wars cinematic experience can’t forever end on Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker . Somehow Star Wars has to return. 

Chet Hanks Is Not Happy About Racists Appropriating 'White Boy Summer'

• White Boy Bummer
• By Jon Blistein

'Rust' Safety Officer Details Alec Baldwin 'Yelling' on Set Over Horse Riding Protocol

• Courts and Crime
• By Larisha Paul

Jason Mraz Missed Cat So Much While on 'Dancing With the Stars' That He Begged Friends Not to Vote for Him

• Escape Plan
• By Kory Grow

Why Are the Emmys Categories So Damn Confusing?

• You say comedy, I say drama
• By Alan Sepinwall

'Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F': Eddie Murphy Hearts the Eighties. A Lot

• MOVIE REVIEW
• By David Fear

Most Popular

The ho-hum box office of kevin costner’s ‘horizon’ carries a message: don’t turn movies into television, eddie murphy says elvis presley, michael jackson and prince all serve as "cautionary tales" for him, nicole kidman & keith urban’s daughter sunday is apparently going by a different name, florida's ron desantis says 'sexual' festival caused him to veto $32 m. in arts grants, you might also like, abc news moves biden-stephanopoulos interview to friday primetime, saks-neiman’s merger has finally arrived: what are the ramifications, the best yoga mats for any practice, according to instructors, ‘outer range’ canceled at amazon after 2 seasons, lebron james returning to lakers on 2-year deal with player option.

Rolling Stone is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2024 Rolling Stone, LLC. All rights reserved.

Verify it's you

Please log in.

What Is the Difference Between Cruise and Ship?

By Robert Palmer

Cruise and ship are two terms that are often used interchangeably, but there are important differences between the two. Cruise ships are generally larger and more luxurious than regular ships.

Cruise ships have a variety of amenities, such as casinos, spas, live entertainment, swimming pools and other recreational activities that can make a cruise vacation more enjoyable. Ships, on the other hand, are typically used for transportation purposes and do not offer the same level of amenities as cruise ships.

Size : Cruise ships tend to be much larger than regular ships; they can range from being 500 feet long up to 1,000 feet long or more. The size of a cruise ship is important due to the number of passengers it can accommodate for a voyage.

Cruises also require much more staff than a regular ship – from housekeeping staff to chefs to entertainers – so the larger size allows them to easily accommodate these personnel. The capacity of regular ships depends on their purpose but usually falls somewhere in between 100-300 passengers.

Amenities : As previously stated, cruise lines offer much more than just transportation. They provide an array of amenities such as on-board casinos, spas, swimming pools and live entertainment that can help make your vacation one you’ll never forget. Regular ships do not typically include these amenities; they usually focus solely on transportation.

Costs : A major difference between cruises and conventional shipping is cost; cruises tend to be significantly more expensive than regular shipping due to their expansive size and high levels of luxury available on board.

Conclusion : In conclusion, while both have their advantages and disadvantages when it comes to choosing the right type of vessel for your needs, it’s important to keep in mind that cruises offer a much higher level of luxury than conventional shipping vessels. They also come with a higher price tag which may be out of reach for some people.

What Is the Difference Between Cruise and Ship? : Cruise vessels are generally larger in size with more luxurious amenities such as casinos, spas and live entertainment while ships are mainly used for transportation purposes and don’t include those types of amenities. Cruises also tend to be significantly more expensive than traditional shipping vessels.

8 Related Question Answers Found

What is difference between ship and cruise, what is the difference between a cruise ship and a cruise liner, what is difference between ocean liner and cruise ship, what is the difference between ocean liner and cruise ship, how would you describe cruise ship, what is the difference between a cruise ship and a ocean liner, what is the difference between a liner and a cruise ship, what is the meaning of cruise ship, backpacking - budget travel - business travel - cruise ship - vacation - tourism - resort - cruise - road trip - destination wedding - tourist destination - best places, london - madrid - paris - prague - dubai - barcelona - rome.

© 2024 LuxuryTraveldiva