oe 29 sailboat

The Oe 29 is a 28.74ft fractional sloop designed by Olle Enderlein (SWE) and built in fiberglass between 1980 and 1981.

4 units have been built..

The Oe 29 is a moderate weight sailboat which is a reasonably good performer. It is very stable / stiff and has a good righting capability if capsized. It is best suited as a coastal cruiser.

Oe 29 for sale elsewhere on the web:

Main features

Login or register to personnalize this screen.

You will be able to pin external links of your choice.

See how Sailboatlab works in video

We help you build your own hydraulic steering system - Lecomble & Schmitt

Accommodations

Builder data, modal title.

The content of your modal.

Personalize your sailboat data sheet

Review of OE 29

Basic specs., sailing characteristics.

This section covers widely used rules of thumb to describe the sailing characteristics. Please note that even though the calculations are correct, the interpretation of the results might not be valid for extreme boats.

What is Capsize Screening Formula (CSF)?

The capsize screening value for OE 29 is 1.88, indicating that this boat could - if evaluated by this formula alone - be accepted to participate in ocean races.

What is Theoretical Maximum Hull Speed?

The theoretical maximal speed of a displacement boat of this length is 6.2 knots. The term "Theoretical Maximum Hull Speed" is widely used even though a boat can sail faster. The term shall be interpreted as above the theoretical speed a great additional power is necessary for a small gain in speed.

The immersion rate is defined as the weight required to sink the boat a certain level. The immersion rate for OE 29 is about 117 kg/cm, alternatively 658 lbs/inch. Meaning: if you load 117 kg cargo on the boat then it will sink 1 cm. Alternatively, if you load 658 lbs cargo on the boat it will sink 1 inch.

Sailing statistics

This section is statistical comparison with similar boats of the same category. The basis of the following statistical computations is our unique database with more than 26,000 different boat types and 350,000 data points.

What is Motion Comfort Ratio (MCR)?

What is L/B (Length Beam Ratio)?

What is Displacement Length Ratio?

What is SA/D (Sail Area Displacement ratio)?

What is Relative Speed Performance?

Maintenance

Are your sails worn out? You might find your next sail here: Sails for Sale

If you need to renew parts of your running rig and is not quite sure of the dimensions, you may find the estimates computed below useful.

This section shown boat owner's changes, improvements, etc. Here you might find inspiration for your boat.

Do you have changes/improvements you would like to share? Upload a photo and describe what to look for.

We are always looking for new photos. If you can contribute with photos for OE 29 it would be a great help.

If you have any comments to the review, improvement suggestions, or the like, feel free to contact us . Criticism helps us to improve.

• LOCATE A DEALER

True North 39 Outboard Express

• LOA – 44’
• Length of Hull – 38’8″
• Waterline – 38’6″
• Beam – 13’6″
• Draft Engines Up – 2′
• Draft Engines Down – 3′
• Displacement – Approx. 20,000 lbs
• Power – 900 HP with Gasoline Outboards, 600 HP with Diesel Outboards, or up to 1200 HP with Gasoline Outboards
• Gasoline Fuel Capacity – 400 Gallons
• Diesel Fuel Capacity – 20 Gallons
• Fresh Water Capacity – 100 Gallons
• Holding Tank Capacity – 30 Gallons
• Air Conditioning – 26-32 k BTU
• Generator – Diesel 608 KW

7200 Bryan Dairy Rd

Largo,  FL 33777

Marine Servicenter

marinesc.com

[email protected]

206.323.2405

www.sailplace.com

[email protected]

616.696.0250

Sail Annapolis

www.sailannapolis.com

410.280.8878

Little Yachts Sales

www.littleyachtsales.com

[email protected]

727.822.5516

Chesapeake Yacht Sales

www.dycboat.com

804.776.9898

True North Yachts

727.544.6681

Cape Yachts

www.capeyachts.com

508.994.4444

G. Winter’s Sailing Center

www.winterssailing.com

856-461-3555

Prestige Yacht Sales

www.prestigeyachtsales.net

Little Yacht Sales

• Favorites 0
• Used Boats for Sale
• Power Boats for Sale
• Sailing Boats for Sale
• Sell Your Boat
• Motor Yacht
• Cabin Cruiser
• Center Console
• Fishing Boat
• Wakeboard/Wakesurf
• Classic Power Boat
• Floating House
• Offshore Boat
• Power Catamaran
• Pontoon Boat
• Utility Boat
• Passenger Ship

Sailing Yacht

• Regatta Boat
• Cruising Yacht
• Center Cockpit
• Deck Saloon
• Classic Sailing Yacht
• Motorsailer
• Sailing Dinghy
• Cruising Dinghy
• Flat Bottom Boat
• Sailing Superyacht
• Foldable Inflatable Boat
• Rowing Boat
• Personal Water Craft

Country • Language

• Category Sailing Boats Category Remove Filter

Multiple selection possible

• Only offers from Europe
• Berth Available
• Tiller Steering
• Wheel control
• Mast Furling
• Boom Furling
• Battened Mainsail
• Roller Furling
• Self-tacking Jib
• Display Model
• New Boat from Stock
• New Boat on Order
• Boat Sharing
• Advanced Search
• Save Search
• More Filters
• Less filters
• Reset Filters

No Ads Found

Your search query.

Oe 29 / Sailing Boats / OE

Let us Find Your Dream Boat

With a search agent notification you will be notified as soon as an advertisement which meets your search criteria is submitted to Boat24

Search Suggestion

Turku königskreuzer 29.

Keelboat, Sailing Yacht

Schöchl Sunbeam 29

Classic Sailing Yacht, Keelboat

OE 32 similar search results:

BAVARIA 34 SPEED

The OE 32 shown below has been sold:

Sales information

• De Valk Monnickendam The Netherlands
• +31 299 65 63 50
• Call the broker

e-mail the broker

Tell a friend.

• download brochure

Take time onboard with a live video tour

Seen a boat that piques your interest but can't make a visit in person? One of our brokers will be your eyes and ears as they take you on a video tour with their phone. You can also ask them questions about anything that isn't visually obvious. Make the call and be welcomed aboard...

Download brochure

Broker's comments.

OE 32, a beautiful S-shaped canoe stern Danish sailing yacht, designed by Olle Enderlein. A yacht with great maneuverability in the smallest port or near shores due to her draft of 1,50 m. Easily handled by the smallest crew under practically all weather conditions, even solo. Engine of 2011, paintjob hull 2012.

General - OE 32

Accommodation.

• New Sailboats
• Sailboats 21-30ft
• Sailboats 31-35ft
• Sailboats 36-40ft
• Sailboats Over 40ft
• Sailboats Under 21feet
• used_sailboats
• Apps and Computer Programs
• Communications
• Fishfinders
• Handheld Electronics
• Plotters MFDS Rradar
• Wind, Speed & Depth Instruments
• Anchoring Mooring
• Running Rigging
• Sails Canvas
• Standing Rigging
• Diesel Engines
• Off Grid Energy
• Cleaning Waxing
• DIY Projects
• Repair, Tools & Materials
• Spare Parts
• Tools & Gadgets
• Cabin Comfort
• Ventilation
• Footwear Apparel
• Foul Weather Gear
• Mailport & PS Advisor
• Inside Practical Sailor Blog
• Activate My Web Access
• Reset Password
• Pay My Bill
• Customer Service

• Free Newsletter
• Give a Gift

How to Sell Your Boat

Cal 2-46: A Venerable Lapworth Design Brought Up to Date

Rhumb Lines: Show Highlights from Annapolis

Open Transom Pros and Cons

Leaping Into Lithium

The Importance of Sea State in Weather Planning

Do-it-yourself Electrical System Survey and Inspection

Install a Standalone Sounder Without Drilling

Rethinking MOB Prevention

Top-notch Wind Indicators

The Everlasting Multihull Trampoline

In Search of the Snag-free Clew

What’s Involved in Setting Up a Lithium Battery System?

Reducing Engine Room Noise

Breaking Point: What Can Go Wrong With Your Yanmar?

Mildew-resistant Caulks for Boats

Can We Trust Plastic Boat Parts?

Repairing Molded Plastics

Mailport: Marine plywood, fuel additives, through bolt options, winch handle holders

The Day Sailor’s First-Aid Kit

Choosing and Securing Seat Cushions

Cockpit Drains on Race Boats

Rhumb Lines: Livin’ the Wharf Rat Life

Resurrecting Slippery Boat Shoes

Shoe Goo’s Gift to Sailors

Tricks and Tips to Forming Do-it-yourself Rigging Terminals

Marine Toilet Maintenance Tips

Learning to Live with Plastic Boat Bits

The Ultimate Guide to Caring for Clear Plastic

• Sailboat Reviews

C&C 29

Produced in two decidedly different versions, this boat sold well behind the c&c name. the original mk i design was a good light-air boat, but was a handful in heavy air..

The story of C&C Yachts is a boating industry epic. The company was founded when designers George Cuthbertson and George Cassian got together with three boatbuilders in 1969 to capitalize on their joint racing success (Red Jacket, a C&C design built by Erich Bruckman and the first balsa-cored racer ever, won the 1968 SORC). Ian Morch and George Hinterhoeller were the other originals. Few sailboat manufacturers have ever achieved such dominance.

Focusing on the racer/cruiser ideal, a reputation for fairly sophisticated construction, and continued race course success (their Redline 41 Sorcery was the last production SORC winner until the late ’80s), the Canadian aggregation grew to own manufacturing plants in three countries and an estimated 20 percent of the US sailboat market. Along the way it offered up a flotilla of well-accepted dual- purpose designs (plus one or two “anomalies” like the ugly-duckling Mega 30) and brought corporate purpose and polish to the “cottage industry” of producing sailboats.

However, recession in the ’80s, competition from a used-boat market (very much of its own making), unfavorable currency fluctuations, and finally a hostile takeover which removed Cuthbertson, last of the founding principals, sent the giant on a downward spiral. Through ownership changes and even receiverships the name (and curtailed production) limped on. Then a fire in 1994 destroyed 40 molds and three near-complete 51-footers. Finally Fairport Marine, the parent company for Tartan Yachts, bought “the name and a few molds” in 1997. Says Tim Jackett, chief designer and general manager at Tartan, “It was an opportunity to take advantage of C&C’s reputation for performance.” He has since introduced two new C&C boats of his own design. “We’re excited that we’re going to have a separate start for a fleet of our C&C Express 99s at Key West this winter,” Jackett reports. (For a review of the new C&C 99, see Practical Sailor’s June 2003 issue.)

From beginning to end (with the exception of its “pure cruising” Landfall series) C&C put racing potential first. That led to hull forms colored by various rating rules, but it has also meant boats with healthy sail area for their displacements; weight-conscious construction; efficient, controllable rigs, and optimized hydrodynamics. Some, like the 30, 35, the 40, and the most-popular C&C 27 (over 1,000 built) have become “classics” and remained remarkably competitive. Others, the C&C 29 among them, were less popular.

The problem with the 29 may have stemmed from difficulty of replacing winners like the 27 and 30, or from being a “transition” between the CCA archetype and the IOR hull form, or from her departure from the “all-round boat” performance model. Whatever the causes, however, they led to a Mark II version that was, in reality, an entirely different boat. The original 29, introduced in 1976, was 29′ 7″ overall. The new boat, launched in 1983, was over a foot shorter. This wasn’t the result of a chopped transom or a plugged mold: The MK II version was narrower (by 11″), lighter (by 800 lbs.) and carried considerably less sail. Thus, while used boat listings will all say “C&C 29”, the distinction between MK I and MK II is much more important in this case than with most other manufacturers and models.

Design The MK I version of the 29 grew out of a management directive to “make our little boats more cost-effective to build.” The resulting 29 was a lighter (by 500 lbs.) and cheaper (700 lbs. less ballast) alternative to the 30. Says Hank Evans, one-time C&C sales manager, “The thinking was to take some of the volume out of the underbody and put it in the topsides, thus reducing wetted surface… This volume was placed above the waterline in rather extreme topside flare. This produced a beamy and roomy interior above the waterline where the space was used for living and storage.”

The “rather extreme” topside flare noted by Mr. Evans is now fairly commonplace.

The new boat was virtually as “liveable” as the 30 that she was meant to replace. However, Evans remembers, the 29’s hull shape “produced a boat that was ‘tender’ at the dock and initially under sail. As the boat heeled the flare became immersed and the boat stiffened markedly. It is actually hard to get the windows of the MK I wet. Unfortunately, as the boat heeled and immersed all that topside flare, the unwanted drag not only slowed her down, it tended to push the bow to windward. That, combined with the rudder becoming less effective (even coming out of the water at times) at greater angles of heel, caused unintentional and undesired round-ups.”

Evans says that the original 29 was one of Cuthbertson’s least favorite designs. “While the 29 was a great success (over 600 sold) with many one- design fleets, and is a pretty good-looking boat, it left a lot to be desired from a design standpoint. It was very fast and nicely balanced in light and moderate air, but the only way to sail her in a breeze is to ease the traveler all the way down and carry the main almost fully aback. Racer/cruisers are not generally intended to be sailed like dinghies.”

A common modification to the MK I 29, especially in heavy-wind areas like San Francisco Bay, is a C&C-designed, 500-pound “shoe,” permanently affixed to her original keel.

“The 29 MK II is a totally different boat,” says Evans. “The two boats have nothing in common but their names.”

The MK II version relies more on ballast than shape when it comes to stability. Though her lead fin weighs the same 2,700 lbs. as her predecessor’s, it’s thicker, straighter, and attached to a deeper stub. In addition to a ballast/displacement ratio improved from 36 to 40 percent, the new boat thus has a decidedly lower center of gravity. Though she is narrower (9′ 5″ beam vs. 10′ 4″) the MK II offers effective form stability due to relatively hard bilges that are carried well fore and aft of her midpoint. U-shaped sections in her forefoot, smooth waterlines, and a “skeg/bustle” leading into the rudder also give her an underbody that helps to smooth out the “crankiness” that characterized the MK I’s performance in a breeze.

Some of the other differences reflect racer/cruiser evolution over the decade separating their design. The MK II has a larger mainsail which, says chief designer Rob Ball, “makes her more effective in puffy conditions.” Her keel is a retreat from the shark-fin profile evident in the MK I, toward a higher-aspect/more vertical planform. Ball explains: “The theory is that you can keep cutting drag by sweeping the keel aft without affecting lift that much. The tank said the shark fin was the way to go. Our boats have always done well off the wind and in light air, but when the ‘Peterson-style’ (vertical trailing edge) foils came along, they proved very fast upwind in a breeze. We moved in that direction to stay competitive, but we did it before we explored the swept-back keel as much as we wanted. Still, there’s no doubting that you can make a straight-edged keel thicker and thus have room for more ballast.”

The MK II’s rudder is also deeper and has a higher aspect ratio than the less effective blade on the first 29.

C & C yachts have been distinguished by a sharp, aggressive, and functional aesthetic from the outset. The two 29s are good examples of the “look of speed” that was a C & C hallmark. But there are subtle differences: With a longer bow overhang, boxier transom, and “scattered” window treatment, the first 29 clearly dates from an earlier time. With a curvier sheer and higher bow, a jaunty counter, and house windows streamlined for effect, the MK II looks much more modern.

Construction Both C&C 29s were built of solid fiberglass with balsa-cored decks. Part of C&C’s pioneering (in addition to balsa coring) was in the use of fiberglass “pans” or structural grids built into the boat to both locate furniture and help distribute working loads. Says Rob Ball, “We’ve used many different forms of grid. We began with a combination of fiberglass with wooden furniture, went more toward an all-glass structure, went back to wood due to market pressure, and finally arrived at inserting the grid and taping and foaming it in place while the hull is still in the mold. Grids, in any case, demand a lot of precision in both molding and assembly.”

The two 29s have very similar grid systems. They extend above the waterline to seat level. Additional furniture is built in and bulkheads are taped and tabbed in place. These bonds, though they may be hidden behind furniture or beneath a headliner, are critical. Checking them should be a first priority with any used boat survey. One owner of a 1979 boat, in fact, reported separation between his hull and the bulkhead supporting a chainplate.

Over the years, laminates have gotten thinner as builders have come to trust more in the properties of their materials. Still, in 1982 the MK II exemplified the sort of robust lay-up that could make interior reinforcing grids seem almost irrelevant: Behind the gelcoat are two 1.5-oz. layers of chopped matt. That is backed by Fabmat, a bi-axial blend of 1.8- and 1.0-oz. matt. Over the “impact area” of the forward third of the boat are arrayed 4-mm plies of Coremat. Additional 1.5- oz plies and another layer of Fabmat are added in the way of the keel, and further layers of Fabmat are used to counteract local loads. Enough MK I owners reported blistering to suggest that it was a significant problem with the older boat, though none reported the pox as catastrophic. A single owner reported “just a few” blisters with the MK II.

Decks on both boats were also built in much the same way. They were cored with 1/2″ end-grain balsa. In areas where hardware is attached, the coring was 1/2″ plywood. A flange of solid glass 6″ wide encircles the deck molding and facilitates the hull/deck attachment. That is done by placing the deck on an inward-turning flange of the hull, sealing the joint and inserting a vinyl rubrail, then bolting the two parts together through a full-length slotted aluminum toerail—another C&C hallmark.

A problem with the MK I has been the mast step. It’s a wooden block, and many owners report having to replace it due to rot.

C&C glasswork has generally been rated above average, but owners of both models have registered complaints about gelcoat crazing and small cracks on the cockpit sole and in the area of winches.

Accommodations Though they have been cruised widely, neither 29 approaches “liveaboard” standards of comfort. The MK I layout is straightforward—a quarterberth and nav station to port, galley to starboard, saloon amidships, a full-width head, and a forecabin that, according to one owner, is “somewhat cave-like.”

Most owners find their boats ideal for a couple and say that space becomes more of a problem with each additional shipmate. Recognizing the limits of a boat under 30 feet and one designed primarily for racing, the majority of early 29 sailors say things like, “We love our boats and cruising in them.”

Still, there are various specific complaints: “The table’s in the way.” “The guy who designed the head door obviously never had to use it.” “What the hell do you need the sink forward for?” “The berths are too short and the overhead is too low.” “There’s no hanging locker.” “The ports leak.” “The deck leaks.” “She needs more tankage.”

The shorter, narrower MK II has no nav station (though a clever swing- down cutting board might be a suitable substitute). The galley is cramped by the companionway stairs, but a bulkhead table opens up the saloon, and there is a hanging locker.) Ventilation (via an overhead port just aft of the mast) is improved, too. Siting the forehatch in the forward slope of the house also improves airflow.

The early 29s were powered by Atomic-4 gasoline engines. The switch to diesel came well into the MK I’s production run. Even using the tidy Yanmar 2 GM, space in the engine compartment is tight and access inconvenient on both boats. While sound insulation appears adequate one owner calls his engine a “clunking, vibrating annoyance, to be used as little as possible.”

The combination of a balanced spade rudder, fin keel, and standard two-bladed prop gets poor reviews for backing with control, and several owners complained that similar-sized auxiliaries were “much faster than we are under power.”

Conclusions In summing up his feelings for his 29 (MK I) Hank Evans says, “Quality and design pay over time.” That’s a catchy mantra, and many owners indeed report that their ancient 29s are “faster, better-looking, and more admired” than more modern competitors.

It’s certainly true that, amidst a host of very similar-looking boats churned out by many builders during the high-volume production years of a couple of decades ago, both the MKI and MK II versions of the C&C 29 stood out from the crowd. They didn’t, in our opinion, stand out entirely on their own design merits, but partially because of the reputation established and trails blazed by the C&C company. Even after all these years, that name commands respect—Tim Jackett and his fellows at Fairport/Tartan were wise to acquire it.

Between the two different versions, more than 1,000 C&C 29s were sold. That’s a success story for any production sailboat.

At press-time, there are 31 listed at www.yachtworld.com, in both versions, by brokers countrywide. Asking prices vary widely, between about $15,000 and $30,000. There doesn’t seem to be a strong correlation between version and price, or even engine type, although listings show several boats that have been converted from the Atomic-4 to Yanmar or Universal diesels.

There are several excellent websites developed by and for C&C owners. Try www.cnc-owners.com and www.cncphotoalbum.com , and from there follow links to other devoted sites.

Also With This Article “C&C 29 Owners’ Comments.”

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Log in to leave a comment

Latest Videos

How To Make Starlink Better On Your Boat | Interview

Catalina 380: What You Should Know | Boat Review

• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell My Personal Information
• Online Account Activation
• Privacy Manager

× You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

We Ship Worldwide! | FREE SHIPPING! for US Continental orders over $99. Click for details.

Shopping Cart

Your cart is currently empty..

FREE SHIPPING! for US Continental orders over $99 click for details

OE 29 - Cruising Mainsails

MAURIPRO Sails

Mzc cruising mainsail (charter) for oe 29, mps-3619-mzc-mfb.

MZC Cruising Mainsail (Charter) In-Mast Furling for OE 29

Mps-3619-mzc-mrf.

MZ2 Cruising Mainsail (Coastal) for OE 29

Mps-3619-mz2-mfb.

MZ4 Cruising Mainsail (Bluewater) for OE 29

Mps-3619-mz4-mbw.

MZ6 Cruising Mainsail (Performance) for OE 29

Mps-3619-mz6-mfb.

MZ6 Cruising Mainsail (Performance) In-Mast Furling for OE 29

Mps-3619-mz6-mrf.

MZ8 Cruising Mainsail (Enduro) for OE 29

Mps-3619-mz8-mct, copyright © 2024 mauripro sailing llc..

Sailor Cole Brauer makes history as the first American woman to race solo around the world

Aboard her 40-foot racing boat First Light ,  29-year-old Cole Brauer just became the first American woman to race nonstop around the world by herself.

The New York native pulled into A Coruña, Spain, on Thursday after a treacherous 30,000-mile journey that took 130 days.

She thanked a cheering crowd of family and fans who had been waiting for her on shore.

“This is really cool and so overwhelming in every sense of the word,” she exclaimed, before drinking Champagne from her trophy.

The 5-foot-2 powerhouse placed second out of 16 avid sailors who competed in the Global Solo Challenge, a circumnavigation race that started in A Coruña with participants from 10 countries. The first-of-its-kind event   allowed a wide range of boats to set off in successive departures based on performance characteristics. Brauer started on Oct. 29, sailing down the west coast of Africa, over to Australia, and around the tip of South America before returning to Spain.

Brauer is the only woman and the youngest competitor in the event — something she hopes young girls in and out of the sport can draw inspiration from.

“It would be amazing if there was just one girl that saw me and said, ‘Oh, I can do that too,’” Brauer said of her history-making sail.

It’s a grueling race, and more than half of the competitors have dropped out so far. One struck something that caused his boat to flood, and another sailor had to abandon his ship after a mast broke as a severe storm was moving in.

The four-month journey is fraught with danger, including navigating the three “Great Capes” of Africa, Australia and South America. Rounding South America’s Cape Horn, where the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans meet, is often likened to climbing Mount Everest because of its perfect storm of hazards — a sharp rise in the ocean floor and whipping westerly winds push up massive waves. Combined with the frigid waters and stray icebergs, the area is known as a graveyard for ships, according to NASA. Brauer  said  she was “so unbelievably stoked” when she sailed past Cape Horn in January.

Marco Nannini, organizer of the Global Solo Challenge, said the comparison to scaling Mount Everest doesn’t capture the difficulty of the race. Sailing solo means not just being a skipper but a project manager — steering the boat, fixing equipment, understanding the weather and maintaining one’s physical health.

Nannini cited the relatively minuscule number of people who have sailed around the world solo — 186, according to the International Association of Cape Horners — as evidence of the challenges that competitors face. More than 6,000 people have climbed Mount Everest, according to  High Adventure Expeditions .

Brauer stared down 30-foot waves that had enough force to throw her across the boat. In a scare caught on camera, she badly injured her rib   near the halfway point of the event. At another point, her team in the U.S. directed Brauer to insert an IV into her own arm due to dehydration from vomiting and diarrhea.

She was able to stay in constant communication with members of her team, most of whom are based in New England,   and keep herself entertained with Netflix and video calls with family through Starlink satellites.   That’s also how Brauer was able to use Zoom to connect with NBC News for an interview, while she was sailing about 1,000 miles west of the Canary Islands.

While Brauer was technically alone on First Light, she had the company of 450,000 followers on Instagram, where she frequently got candid about life on an unforgiving sea while reflecting on her journey.

“It all makes it worth it when you come out here, you sit on the bow, and you see how beautiful it is,” she said in an Instagram video, before panning the camera to reveal the radiant sunrise.

Brauer grew up on Long Island but didn’t learn to sail until she went to college in Hawaii. She traded in her goal of becoming a doctor for life on the water. But she quickly learned making a career as a sailor is extremely difficult, with professional racers often hesitant to welcome a 100-pound young woman on their team.

Even when she was trying to find sponsors for the Global Solo Challenge, she said a lot of people “wouldn’t touch her with a 10-foot pole” because they saw her as a “liability.”

Brauer’s message to the skeptics and naysayers? “Watch me.”

“I push so much harder when someone’s like, ‘No, you can’t do that,’ or ‘You’re too small,’” Brauer explained.

“The biggest asset is your mental strength, not the physical one,” Nannini said. “Cole is showing everyone that.”

Brauer hopes to continue competing professionally and is already eyeing another around-the-world competition, but not before she gets her hands on a croissant and cappuccino.

“My mouth is watering just thinking about that.”

Emilie Ikeda is an NBC News correspondent.

Great choice! Your favorites are temporarily saved for this session. Sign in to save them permanently, access them on any device, and receive relevant alerts.

• Sailboat Guide

C&C 29 is a 29 ′ 7 ″ / 9 m monohull sailboat designed by C&C Design and built by C&C Yachts between 1977 and 1981.

• 2 / 5 Annapolis, MD, US 1979 C&C 29 $4,000 USD View
• 3 / 5 Annapolis, MD, US 1979 C&C 29 $4,000 USD View
• 4 / 5 Annapolis, MD, US 1979 C&C 29 $4,000 USD View
• 5 / 5 Annapolis, MD, US 1979 C&C 29 $4,000 USD View

Rig and Sails

Auxilary power, accomodations, calculations.

The theoretical maximum speed that a displacement hull can move efficiently through the water is determined by it's waterline length and displacement. It may be unable to reach this speed if the boat is underpowered or heavily loaded, though it may exceed this speed given enough power. Read more.

Classic hull speed formula:

Hull Speed = 1.34 x √LWL

Max Speed/Length ratio = 8.26 ÷ Displacement/Length ratio .311 Hull Speed = Max Speed/Length ratio x √LWL

Sail Area / Displacement Ratio

A measure of the power of the sails relative to the weight of the boat. The higher the number, the higher the performance, but the harder the boat will be to handle. This ratio is a "non-dimensional" value that facilitates comparisons between boats of different types and sizes. Read more.

SA/D = SA ÷ (D ÷ 64) 2/3

• SA : Sail area in square feet, derived by adding the mainsail area to 100% of the foretriangle area (the lateral area above the deck between the mast and the forestay).
• D : Displacement in pounds.

Ballast / Displacement Ratio

A measure of the stability of a boat's hull that suggests how well a monohull will stand up to its sails. The ballast displacement ratio indicates how much of the weight of a boat is placed for maximum stability against capsizing and is an indicator of stiffness and resistance to capsize.

Ballast / Displacement * 100

Displacement / Length Ratio

A measure of the weight of the boat relative to it's length at the waterline. The higher a boat’s D/L ratio, the more easily it will carry a load and the more comfortable its motion will be. The lower a boat's ratio is, the less power it takes to drive the boat to its nominal hull speed or beyond. Read more.

D/L = (D ÷ 2240) ÷ (0.01 x LWL)³

• D: Displacement of the boat in pounds.
• LWL: Waterline length in feet

Comfort Ratio

This ratio assess how quickly and abruptly a boat’s hull reacts to waves in a significant seaway, these being the elements of a boat’s motion most likely to cause seasickness. Read more.

Comfort ratio = D ÷ (.65 x (.7 LWL + .3 LOA) x Beam 1.33 )

• D: Displacement of the boat in pounds
• LOA: Length overall in feet
• Beam: Width of boat at the widest point in feet

Capsize Screening Formula

This formula attempts to indicate whether a given boat might be too wide and light to readily right itself after being overturned in extreme conditions. Read more.

CSV = Beam ÷ ³√(D / 64)

Shoal draft: 4.0’. Based on IOR 1/2 ton. Built at C&C’s RI USA plant.

Embed this page on your own website by copying and pasting this code.

Discover Related Sailboats

C&c 1/2 ton.

• About Sailboat Guide

©2024 Sea Time Tech, LLC

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.